When reading the paper it seemed really familiar and similar to a previous MIT scholar's paper I have read before. When I got back to the MIT paper, I found that this paper largely copied parts of the MIT paper without any referencing. 
The paper I am talking about is available online:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V2K-4J6W768-1&_user=809099&_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000043939&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=809099&md5=fb4e8285c6ca3a6789ba6f0b3e1e333c

I strongly suggest the paper to be turned down as it will be extremely embarrassing if published in the conference proceedings.
