This is an interesting research, but some of the discussions involve irrelevant issues and aspects. While the author excuses that he/she did not have time to include images, this paper itself seems to be incomplete and the research is unsolved. For instance, although the de-con. has impacted architecture theoretically and led to re-composition of architectural form as the author discusses, it had little to do with surface so more argument is needed to discuss surface from the decon. In addition, there is a logical gap between Baudrillard and architectural surface. As a whole, compared to the first half that displays the author’s supporting ideas based on the intensive research on the theory, his/her own discourse in the latter half is a kind of generic. It is still a showcase of theories of others and the author’s own view and contribution are not clarified. 
For detail, learning form the manufacturing industry the Voxel-based model is becoming commonplace in architectural discipline with recent improved computer power (it is still a kind of expensive though), so the author might not exclude it in a single line. Footnote does not conform to the required paper format (essentially prohibited) and some typos are found; e.g. modeling and modelling coexist, so correct them carefully
