This is an interesting excurse into theroy and philosophy that relates to recent deveoplment in architectural design. It is crutial to frame the new ways of how design is perceived with exisitng idea and theories.
The paper is however a bit too much argueing without substantial evidence. some of the references and cross-links are a bit too far fetched and dont really come to a clear message or point. Where is H. pixels then finally?
I think if the paper is more streamlined, less overall and focuses more on one key point (e.g. the pixel) then it can be very good. Yet it needs this amendments.
Formating and styles are all over the places. 
the :Definitions of Critical Sub-systems Ellner, 1981: is not helpful at all and just lists points. there is no context and explation. shoudl be deleted.