The paper lacks of focus. There are too many issues that the authors trying to highlight.
e.g. : 

1.Issues of architecture and reality versus virtual architecture.
2. Issues on digital architecture application.
3. The samples highlighted (projects that have been awarded or completed) were too broad and diificult to relate to the earlier discussion.

This paper is undeveloped in terms of idea, its relation to the theory (context) and the goal for others to share. 

The are many grammatical errors and 'word jargons' require definition that certainly need to scope down. I feel that this is more like a 'catalogue' of projects that the authors did or currently developing. So what's is so special compare to others?


