I found this submission very confusing and unclear at a fundamental level.  There is lots of jargon and diagrams, and it needs better structure in terms of framing the overall context. I feel it needs a lot of work to be convincing. DesignMap certainly tries to claim a lot in terms of the contribution it is making but I feel it is flawed in many respects. The conclusion of this paper where it is claimed that this approach provides the foundations for a seamless and continuous designing environment for architects and urban planners through its innovative modeling system, integrated designing framework and novel design library is a tall claim to make.  It is pitched very high but fails to make the argument for such a system. A computing scientist may find this type of project interesting from a theoretical point of view in terms programming, networking, sharing data etc but I still question this as a working practical tool.