•	The presented work is very well put together; however, there exist some spelling and grammar mistakes. For example:  a) in the abstract: Overall, the research demonstrate(s) the power of internet that…; b) section 4.1: The household profile here indicates the major occupants for the new house and does not relate(d) with…; c) section 4.1 again: The content of (the) question will (be) base(d) upon the answer of the previous (preceding/prior) question. In some cases, this question tries to determine the future needs of the room requirement(s). For instance, a young couple plan(ning) to have children will affect (the number of bedrooms) in the list of required spaces.
•	When referring to a part of a figure, it’s enough to state “figure 8 left” with no need to mention the word “image”.
•	After the 2nd phase of your design process a plan layout is automatically generated. Does this output represent a bubble diagram, i.e. just a diagrammatic layout, or does it represent a complete plan layout? Or let’s put it in another way, you generate a layout based upon the different chosen spaces and their adjacency preferences. However, these inputs might generate more than one layout. How do you determine the most appropriate one? Is the end-user knowledgeable enough to make the right choice? 
•	The generated layout in figure 6 left is too small to be readable.
•	i_Prefab was never mentioned before page 7. It’s clear that it’s the name of the developed application. However, it is advisory to clear that out from the beginning of describing your tool.
•	i_Prefab limited the role of the architect to reviewing and revising the layout “designed” by the end user, i.e. it eliminated the creative role of the architect. Do you believe this will encourage architects to use your suggested system? In other words, you need to clearly state that architects are NOT the main user target group of such an application, but it’s rather online catalogue house design providers (if this is the case).
•	There is no “figure 10”, but you jumped from 9 directly to 11.
•	You can replace “conclusion” with “conclusion & outlook”, since you propose future work in that paragraph as well.