•	The presented work is very well put together; however, some sentences need revision (due to spelling, grammar or structure mistakes) to ensure clear readability. Section 3.2: “It can be defined as (a) any freely… same section, last paragraph: “To make continues customization and reuse possible in a dwelling, there are five types...” I’m not sure, if this should be re-written as follows: “To make continuous customization and reuse possible of a dwelling, there are five types…” Such mistakes are frequently found all through the paper, taking care of them will increase the value of the presented work.
•	The ASCAAD required layout is not fully considered in part 2; some texts are in size 11 and others in 12.
•	The different figures are referred to within the text. However, more elaborated explanations of those figures are highly recommended.
•	It might be advisable to add an example that represents the full scenario of the design process. Such an example will clear out the different tasks of the client, the architect, and the manufacturer; as well as pointing out when is each of those tasks taking place. 