Where we do we make our “being?”  Since our existence [being-there = Dasein] is the original place of intelligibility, fundamental ontology must clarify the conditions of having any understanding which itself belongs to the entity called Dasein.  Today Dasein in increasing becoming more and more digital, in fact all activity is digital or becoming digital in one mode or another, it’s ubiquitous!   Alberto Perez-Gomez (2006) Commented on the use of technology in his essay, Dwelling on Heidegger: Architecture as mimetic techno-poiesis, “Our world as technology is unavoidable, the only way to determine the quality of a building conducive to dwelling must be through technology itself.  While recognizing the distinctions between traditional techne and technology as modes of action and the vastly differing relationships they set up between the imagining self and the world, a building as dwelling must be construed through technology, using this critical meditation to disclose the “mysterious” origins of technology in techne and its capacity to embody truth, in the mode of “aletheia”.  
Making places for human inhabitation in a nonphysical space raises interesting questions concerning presence, authenticity, adaptability, orientation, and suspension of disbelief. What kind of activities can be supported by nonphysical spaces? What will it take to support them in a socially and psychologically appropriate manner?  And WHO will design them?  This is the crux of this research and its manifestation upon architecture design and building.
