--
-- Host: localhost    Database: okeilc5_testing
-- ------------------------------------------------------


--
-- Table structure for table `author`
--

CREATE TABLE `author` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `position` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `name_last` varchar(40) NOT NULL default '',
  `name_first` varchar(60) NOT NULL default '',
  `organization` varchar(255) default NULL,
  `country` varchar(100) default NULL,
  `email` varchar(100) default NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`position`),
  KEY `organization` (`organization`),
  KEY `email` (`email`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `author`
--

INSERT INTO `author` (`paperid`, `position`, `name_last`, `name_first`, `organization`, `country`, `email`) VALUES (11,1,'Odeyale','Oluseyi','Department of Architecture, Federal University of Technology, Akure','Nigeria','odeyaleoluseyi@yahoo.com'),(11,2,'Balogun','Victor','Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure','Nigeria','victobal@yahoo.co.uk'),(11,3,'Dahunsi','Funmi','Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure','Nigeria','fmdahunsi@yahoo.com'),(12,1,'Alomari','Hafsa','University of Mosul-Engineering Gollege-Architectural Department','Iraq','hafsa_alomari2004@yahoo.com'),(12,2,'Saeed Yousif','Firas Mohammed','','Iraq','firassaeed@yahoo.com'),(13,1,'Amireh','Omar','University of Jordan','Jordan','oma_amir2000@yahoo.co.uk'),(21,1,'Chen','Guan-Ye Mivo','National Chiao Tung University','Taiwan','mivochen@gmail.com'),(17,1,'Sidawi','Bhzad','King Fasial University, College of Architecture and Planning','Saudi Arabia','Bsidawi@kfu.edu.sa'),(18,1,'Abdelhameed','Wael','South Valley University','Egypt','wael.abdelhameed@gmail.com'),(18,2,'Kobayashi','Yoshihiro','South Valley University','USA','ykobaya@asu.edu'),(19,1,'Kobayashi','Yoshihiro','Arizona State University','USA','ykobaya@asu.edu'),(19,2,'Abdelhameed','Wael','South Valley University','Egypt','wael.abdelhameed@gmail.com'),(20,1,'Rafi','Ahmad','Multimedia University','Malaysia','ahmadrafi.eshaq@mmu.edu.my'),(20,2,'Mat Rani','Ruzaimi','International Islamic University','Malaysia','ruzaimi@iiu.edu.my'),(22,1,'Davey','Jon','Southern Illinois University','USA','Jdavey@siu.edu'),(22,2,'Anz','Craig','Southern Illinois University','USA','canz@siu.edu'),(22,3,'Brazley','Michael','Southern Illinois University','USA','mdbraz7@siu.edu'),(24,2,'Krawczyk','Robert','Illinois Institute of Technology','USA','krawczyk@iit.edu'),(24,1,'Huang','Chuen-huei','Illinois Institute of Technology','USA','huanchu1@iit.edu'),(30,2,'Saadallah','Dina','University of Alexandria','Egypt','dina_saadallah@hotmail.com'),(30,1,'Bakr','Ali','University of Alexandria','Egypt','alibakr_2000@yahoo.com'),(31,1,'Bakr','Ali','University of Alexandria','Egypt','alibakr_2000@yahoo.com'),(31,2,'Diab','Ihab','University of Alexandria','Egypt','arch_ehab_diab@yahoo.com'),(31,3,'Saadallah','Dina','University of Alexandria','Egypt','dina_saadallah@hotmail.com'),(32,1,'Loemker','Thorsten Michael','Technische Universität Dresden','Germany','thorsten.loemker@tu-dresden.de'),(33,3,'Streich','Bernd','University of Kaiserslautern','Germany','streich@rhrk.uni-kl.de'),(33,2,'Hosni','Samir','Alexandria University','Egypt','samir_hosni@hotmail.com'),(33,1,'Taha','Dina','Alexandria University','Egypt','ditaha@idsc.net.eg'),(34,1,'Dawood','Nashwan','CCIR, University of Teesside','UK','n.n.dawood@tees.ac.uk'),(34,2,'Sushant','Sika','CCIR, University of Teesside','UK','E5096253@tees.ac.uk'),(35,1,'Hudson','Roly','Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering University of Bath','UK','rh243@bath.ac.uk'),(35,2,'Shepherd','Paul','Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering University of Bath','UK','P.Shepherd@bath.ac.uk'),(36,1,'El Razaz','Zeinab','Helwan University, Faculty of Engineering, Mataria.','Cairo,Egypt','Drzeinabelrazaz@yahoo.com'),(37,1,'Dawood','Nashwan','University of Teesside','UK','n.n.dawood@tees.ac.uk'),(37,2,'Dean','John','University of Teesside','UK','john.dean@tees.ac.uk'),(37,3,'Loh','Eugene','University of Teesside','UK','eugene.loh@tees.ac.uk'),(38,1,'mohamed, morsy','sahar','','Egypt','sahar_morsy@yahoo.com'),(39,1,'HOSSAM ELDIEN','HANY','SUEZ CANAL UNIVERSITY','EGYPT','hany.hossam@gmail.com'),(40,1,'Afify','Hazem','Monofieye University - Egypt','Egypt','hazemmafify@yahoo.com'),(41,1,'Islami','S. Yhaya','The University of Edinburgh','United Kingdom','yahyaz@gmail.com'),(42,2,'Tonn','Christian','Bauhaus-Universität Weimar','Germany','christian.tonn@archit.uni-weimar.de'),(42,1,'Petzold','Frank','Bauhaus-Universität Weimar','Germany','petzold@archit.uni-weimar.de'),(43,1,'de los Reyes','August','Harvard University','USA','adelosre@gsd.harvard.edu'),(43,2,'Terzidis','Kostas','Harvard University','USA','kostas@gsd.harvard.edu'),(46,2,'Donn','Michael','Victoria University of Wellington','New Zealand','Michael.Donn@vuw.ac.nz'),(46,1,'Ryan','Rachel','Victoria University of Wellington','New Zealand','Rachel.A.Ryan@gmail.com'),(47,1,'Kwee','Verdy','The University of Adelaide','Australia','verdy.kwee@adelaide.edu.au'),(48,1,'Baya','Belmessaoud','University of Ferhat Abbes','Algera','belmbaya@gmail.com'),(49,1,'Matsunaga','Naomi','Lemon Gasui Co., Ltd,','Japan','naomi-m@lemon.co.jp'),(49,2,'Kaga','Atsuko','Osaka University','Japan','\"KAGA, Atsuko\" <kaga_atsuko@env.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp>'),(49,3,'Fukuda','Tomohiro','Osaka University','Japan','TomohiroFUKUDA <fukuda@see.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp>'),(52,1,'Vasconcelos Leite','Julieta','Université René Descartes - Paris V','France /  Brazil','julietaleite@gmail.com'),(52,2,'Zancheti','Silvio','Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE','Brazil','smz@ceci-br.org'),(56,1,'Ambrose','Michael','University of Maryland','USA','ambrosem@umd.edu'),(57,1,'Schmitzberger','Axel','California State Polytechnic University Pomona','United States','schmitzberge@csupomona.edu'),(60,1,'Germen','Murat','Sabanci University','Turkey','muratgermen@sabanciuniv.edu'),(45,1,'Bazlamit','Rusaila','University of Jordan / Faculty of Arts and Design','Jordan','super.devoika@gmail.com'),(118,1,'Taha','Dina','Alexandria University','Egypt','ditaha@idsc.net.eg'),(61,1,'Satti','Hassan','Barwa Real Estate Company','Qatar','hassan.satti@gmail.com'),(64,1,'Al-Ali','Amal','University of Glamorgan','UK','amal_al_ali@hotmail.com'),(67,1,'Speed','Chris','University of Plymouth','UK','c.speed@plymouth.ac.uk'),(42,3,'Schneider','Sven','Bauhaus-Universität Weimar','Germany','sven.schneider2@web.de'),(42,4,'Donath','Dirk','Bauhaus-Universität Weimar','Germany','donath@archit.uni-weimar.de'),(72,1,'falkner','christoph','vienna technical university, institute for architecture and design','austria','falkner@tuwien.ac.at'),(72,2,'hoog','jochen','vienna technical university, institute for architecture and design','austria','jochen.hoof@prozessatelier.net'),(72,3,'kühn','christian','vienna technical university, institute for architecture and design','austria','ckuehn@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at'),(74,3,'Takenaka','Rie','Toyohashi University of Technology','Japan','tomat0mato@yahoo.co.jp'),(74,2,'Sasaki','Daisuke','Toyohashi University of Technology','Japan','mega_house_ylo_oly@yahoo.co.jp'),(74,1,'Matsushima','Shiro','Toyohashi University of Technology','Japan','shirom@tutrp.tut.ac.jp'),(75,1,'Karandinou','Anastasia','The University of Edinburgh','United Kingdom','a.karandinou@sms.ed.ac.uk'),(75,2,'Al-Attili','Aghlab','The University of Edinburgh','United Kingdom','Al-Attili@ed.ac.uk'),(76,1,'Hussain','Nisreen','NED University of Engineering and Technology','Pakistan','ar.nisreen@gmail.com'),(76,2,'Kehani','Ravindar','NED University of Engineering and Technology','Pakistan','architectravi@yahoo.com'),(77,1,'Jaskiewicz','Tomasz','TU Delft','the Netherlands','t.j.jaskiewicz@tudelft.nl'),(78,1,'Brown','Michael','Architect','Germany','brown@studio-da.org'),(78,2,'Schaedler','Tino','Art Director for Film','United Kingdom','schaedler@studio-da.org'),(79,1,'Mokbel','Hala','Worcester Polytechnic Institute','USA','hnmokbel@wpi.edu'),(79,2,'Aboulezz','Mohamed','Tocci Group of Companies','USA','maboulezz@tocci.com'),(79,3,'Salazar','Guillermo','Worcester polytechnic Institute','USA','salazar@wpi.edu'),(79,4,'Tocci','John','Tocci Group of Companies','USA','jtocci@tocci.com'),(80,1,'Calderon','Carlos','Newcastle University','UK','carlos.calderon@ncl.ac.uk'),(80,2,'calderon','carlos','Newcastle University','UK','d_a_gillespie@hotmail.com'),(80,3,'Gillespie','David','','',''),(81,1,'Dritsas','Stylianos','Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates','England','sdritsas@kpf.com'),(81,2,'Rafailaki','Eirini','RHWL Architects','England','erafailaki@rhwl.com'),(82,2,'Calderon','Carlos','University of Newcastle upon Tyne','UK','Carlos.Calderon@ncl.ac.uk'),(82,1,'Abdellatif','Reham','University of Newcastle upon Tyne','UK','Reham.Abdellatif@ncl.ac.uk'),(86,1,'Tolba','Osama','Arab Academy for Science and Technology, Cairo','Egypt','otolba@gmail.com'),(87,1,'Celento','David','Harvard Graduate School of Design','USA','dcelento@gmail.com'),(88,2,'Kühn','Christian','TU Vienna','Austria','c.kuehn@tuwien.ac.at'),(88,1,'Grasl','Thomas','TU Vienna','Austria','thomas@grasl.com'),(89,1,'Pratini','Edison','University of Brasilia','Brazil','pratini@unb.br'),(90,1,'Mallasi','Zaki','Perkins + Will','USA','z_malasi@hotmail.com'),(91,2,'AKIN','OMER','Carnegie Mellon University','USA','oa04@andrew.cmu.edu'),(91,1,'LEE','SANGHOON','Carnegie Mellon University','USA','shl1@andrew.cmu.edu'),(93,1,'Batson','William','University of Kentucky, College of Design and BCTC','USA','wbats2@uky.edu'),(166,1,'Sulaiman','Mohamad Jamil','SIRIM Berhad','Malaysia','jamil@sirim.my'),(167,1,'El Sayary','Samer','Alexandria University','Egypt','Architect_samer@yahoo.com'),(97,4,'Trucco','E.','University of Dundee','UK',''),(97,3,'Lukins','T.C.','Heriot-Watt University','UK',''),(97,2,'Ibrahim','Y.M.','Heriot-Watt University','UK',''),(97,1,'Kaka','Ammar P.','Heriot-Watt University','UK','a.p.kaka@hw.ac.uk'),(98,2,'Malkawi','Ali','School of Design, University of Pennsylvania','United States','malkawi@design.upenn.edu'),(98,1,'Tarabieh','Khaled','School of Design, University of Pennsylvania','United States','tarabieh@pobox.upenn.edu'),(99,1,'Techel','Florian','Department of Architectural Engineering - University of Sharjah','United Arab Emirates','techel@sharjah.ac.ae'),(99,2,'Nassar','Khaled','Department of Architectural Engineering - University of Sharjah','United Arab Emirates','knassar@sharjah.ac.ae'),(97,5,'Aouad','G.','University of Salford','UK',''),(101,2,'shateh','hadi','architecture department / El-Mergeb University','Libya','hasshateh@yahoo.com'),(101,1,'alsherif','amal','','Libya','amal_alsherif@yahoo.com'),(111,3,'Mat Rani','Ruzaimi','International Islamic University','Malaysia','ruzaimi@iiu.edu.my'),(111,2,'Rafi','Ahmad','Multimedia University','Malaysia','ahmadrafi.eshaq@mmu.edu.my'),(111,1,'Sharji','Elyna Amir','Multimedia University','Malaysia','elyna.amir@mmu.edu.my'),(101,3,'Abo Jenah','Omar','architecture Dep. Al Fateh Un.','Libya','hass107@hotmail.com'),(116,1,'Othman','Alma','An Najah National University','Palestine','alma_othman@najah.edu'),(116,2,'Al Attili','Aghlab','The University of Edinburgh','United Kingdom','Al-Attili@ed.ac.uk'),(118,2,'Maarouf','Ibrahim','Alexandria University','Egypt','ibrahim.maarouf@gmail.com'),(119,1,'Maarouf','Ibrahim','Alexandria University','Egypt','ibrahim.maarouf@gmail.com'),(119,2,'Taha','Dina','Alexandria University','Egypt','ditaha@idsc.net.eg'),(120,1,'Ahmed Sheta','Sherief','Mansoura University','Egypt','shetash11@yahoo.com'),(122,1,'Ibrahim','Magdy','Ain Shams University','Egypt','magdy.mi@gmail.com'),(124,1,'sheweka','samar','space consultant','Cairo,Egypt','shewieka@yahoo.com'),(125,1,'Mat Raschid','Mohammad Yazah','University of Melbourne','Australia','yazahraschid@yahoo.com'),(125,2,'Mat Raschid','Mohammad Yazah','','',''),(126,1,'Perez','Edgardo','In_trope design','Puerto Rico','cuajocompike@hotmail.com'),(128,1,'Villalon','Rachelle','Massachusetts Institute of Technology','USA','rvill@mit.edu'),(128,2,'Lobel','Josh','Massachusetts Institute of Technology','USA','jlobel@mit.edu'),(45,2,'Verma','Mansie','','UK','mansie@2oblong.com'),(129,3,'Lattuca','Raimondo','Dipartimento di Progetto e Costruzione Edilizia - University of Palermo','Italy','raimondol@hotmail.com'),(129,1,'Pellitteri','Giuseppe','Dipartimento di Progetto e Costruzione Edilizia - University of Palermo','Italy','pellitt@unipa.it'),(129,2,'Concialdi','Salvatore','Dipartimento di Progetto e Costruzione Edilizia - University of Palermo','Italy','concialdi@unipa.it'),(131,1,'Hamza','Neveen','Northumbria University','UK','n.hamza@northumbria.ac.uk'),(131,2,'Horne','Margaret','Northumbria University','UK','m.horne@unn.ac.uk'),(135,1,'Menges','Achim','Architectural Association - AA School of Architecure','Great Britain','achimmenges@aaschool.ac.uk'),(136,2,'Kathleen','De Bodt','Higher Institute of Architectural Sciences Henry van De Velde & Delft University of Technology','Belgium','k.debodt@ha.be'),(136,1,'Lee','Sang','Delft University of Technology','The Netherlands','s.lee@tudelft.nl'),(137,1,'Williams','R. Yauger','Texas A&M University, College Station','USA','yauger@tamu.edu'),(138,1,'BELKAID','Alia','ENAU ( Ecole Nationale d\'Architecture et d\'Urbanisme)-Sidi Bou Said','Tunisia','a.belkaid@gnet.tn'),(138,2,'BEN SACI','Abdelkader','ENSA ( Ecole Nationale Supérieure  d\'Architecture)-Grenoble','France','bensaci@grenoble.archi.fr'),(139,1,'ALRAWI','OSAMA','Alazhar University','EGYPT','pleximotif@yahoo.com'),(140,1,'Shehata','&#1616;Ahmed','Um Al-Qura University','K.S.A','elsherouk@hotmail.com'),(143,1,'LaCharite','Lisa','Square 134 Architects','USA','Lisa.LaCharite@gmail.com'),(143,2,'Ambrose','Michael','The University of Maryland School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation','USA','AmbroseM@umd.edu'),(165,2,'Paterson','G.','The Robert Gordon University','UK','g.j.paterson@rgu.ac.uk'),(165,1,'Kouider','Tahar','The Robert Gordon University','UK','t.kouider@rgu.ac.uk'),(145,1,'Alamgir','Mrs. Sabahat','University of Engg. & Technology, Lahore,Pakistan','Mrs. Sabahat Alamgir','sabahatarif@hotmail.com'),(145,2,'Alamgir','Sabahat','University of Engg. & Tech; Lahore, Pakistan','Pakistan','arifuet@hotmail.com'),(147,1,'EL Masry','Mona Hassan','Departement of Architecture.Faculty of Fine Arts.Alexandria University','Alexandria - Egypt','monamasry@yahoo.com'),(147,2,'Mostapha','Ebtissam Mohamed Farid','Departement of Architecture.Faculty of Fine Arts.Alexandria University','Alexandria - Egypt','ebtissam20@yahoo.com'),(148,1,'Zeile','Peter','TU Kaiserslautern','Germany','peter@zeile.net'),(148,2,'Reichrath','Martin','TU Kaiserslautern','Germany','martin.reichrath@gmx.de'),(149,1,'Zeile','Peter','TU Kaiserslautern','Germany','peter@zeile.net'),(149,2,'Bernd','Streich','TU Kaiserslautern','Germany','streich@rhrk.uni-kl.de'),(149,3,'Faraneh','Farnoudi','TU Kaiserslautern','',''),(150,1,'Silva','Neander','Universidade de Brasília','Brazil','neander@unb.br'),(150,2,'Lima','Ecilamar','Universidade de Brasília','Brazil','ecilamar@unb.br'),(151,1,'Silva','Neander','Universidade de Brasília','Brazil','neander@unb.br'),(151,2,'Lima','Ecilamar','Universidade de Brasília','Brazil','ecilamar@unb.br'),(155,1,'Samy Yousef Mohamed','Abeer','Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University','Egypt','drabeersamy@yahoo.com'),(156,1,'Biloria','Nimish','TU Delft','Netherlands','nimish.biloria@gmail.com'),(157,1,'Fujita','Hamido','Iwate Prefectural University','Japan','issam@soft.iwate-pu.ac.jp'),(160,1,'Teuffel','Patrick','Leeds University','UK','p.teuffel@leeds.ac.uk'),(160,2,'Braun','Dirk Henning','University of Stuttgart','Germany','dirk-henning.braun@ibk2.uni-stuttgart.de'),(161,1,'Okeil','Ahmad','British University in Dubai','UAE','ahmad.okeil@buid.ac.ae'),(33,4,'Sueyllam','Hisham','Alexandria University','Egypt','sueyllam@yahoo.com'),(163,1,'Zeile','Peter','University of Kaiserslautern','Germany','zeile@rhrk.uni-kl.de'),(163,2,'Farnoudi','Faraneh','University of Kaiserslautern','Germany','farnoudi@rhrk.uni-kl.de'),(163,3,'Streich','Bernd','University of Kaiserslautern','Germany',''),(164,1,'Ibrahim','Mohammad  Arefeen','American Intl. University-Bangladesh','Bangladesh','arefeen@aiub.edu'),(164,2,'Saleh Uddin','M.','American International University-Bangladesh','Bangladesh','uddinsaleh@aiub.edu');

--
-- Table structure for table `conflict`
--

CREATE TABLE `conflict` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `reviewerid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`reviewerid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `conflict`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `paperadvocate`
--

CREATE TABLE `paperadvocate` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `advocateid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `adv_recommendation` enum('Accept','Reject','Unsure') default NULL,
  `adv_comments` text,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`advocateid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `paperadvocate`
--


--
-- Table structure for table `paperreviewer`
--

CREATE TABLE `paperreviewer` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `reviewerid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `completed` enum('T','F') NOT NULL default 'F',
  `updated` date default NULL,
  `recommendation` tinyint(1) unsigned default NULL,
  `category` tinyint(1) unsigned default NULL,
  `value` varchar(20) default NULL,
  `familiar` enum('High','Low','Moderate') default NULL,
  `bpcandidate` enum('Yes','No','Unsure') default NULL,
  `length` enum('Yes','No','Unsure') default NULL,
  `difference` tinyint(1) unsigned default NULL,
  `pccomments` text,
  `authorcomments` text,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`reviewerid`),
  KEY `completed` (`completed`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `paperreviewer`
--

INSERT INTO `paperreviewer` (`paperid`, `reviewerid`, `completed`, `updated`, `recommendation`, `category`, `value`, `familiar`, `bpcandidate`, `length`, `difference`, `pccomments`, `authorcomments`) VALUES (13,21,'T','2007-09-02',4,2,'5','Low','No','No',4,'The literature does not cover all the ideas which were introduced in the paper. Also, there are more literatures and references that are related to this subject, in which the authors did not try to benefit from.\r\n\r\nThere should be more information describing the idea of abstraction.\r\n\r\nThe idea between abstractions and creativity is not clear.\r\n\r\nThe illustrations are not very clear.\r\n\r\nThe authors try to limit designing into certain design solutions for the problem in the hand, and this is contradicting with the idea of creativity.\r\n\r\nThe authors could not clearly define the paper’s main problem and the suggestion solutions.\r\n','The literature does not cover all the ideas which were introduced in the paper. Also, there are more literatures and references that are related to this subject, in which the authors did not try to benefit from.\r\n\r\nThere should be more information describing the idea of abstraction.\r\n\r\nThe idea between abstractions and creativity is not clear.\r\n\r\nThe illustrations are not very clear.\r\n'),(17,3,'T','2007-09-01',4,2,'4','High','No','Yes',4,'This research is at an early stage of investigation and studies a new topic. The author needs to provide in depth analysis of the theories related to his/her topic.','the paper introduces a new topic concerns with implementing users lifestyle in future CAD systems specifically nD CAD tools. The objective of the research is vaguely clarified and needs to be re-written clearly for the user. For example, in the abstract the author should clearly modify the sentence beginning with \'This paper suggests that various aspects...\' and then adds \'such as 1, 2, 3 etc. So clearly mentions these aspects to the reader.\r\n\r\nThe proposed research framework diagram is very abroad and does not show what user lifestyles are involved. I suggest that the author defines these lifestyle items in Section 3 in depth instead of from general perspective. For example, what does quality of living made of? How can it be measured? Another example, what is the definition of spiritual/material need as part of lifestyle? It is so important to study describe define these aspects of lifestyle. There is great deal of theory in the logic of social dimension by Prof. Bill Hiller. Even nD CAD tools & research in Salford University is based on it.\r\n\r\nGeneral notes on language and paper:\r\n- Section 1 paragraph 1: \'The architecture mission...\' should be \'The\r\nmission of architecture is to ...\'\r\n- Always use he/she throughout the paper, instead of \'he\' only.\r\n- Page 3, second paragraph: change \'3D CAD models invented...\' to \'3D CAD systems created...\'\r\n- Move all the endnotes after the References section and re-write them\r\nwithin the text. If possible, explain briefly these endnotes within the actual body of the text.\r\n- Page 3, paragraph 3: the statement is not true. It reads as if IFC improves the decision making process and so on. Instead, IFC enables good interoperability of CAD models between CAD tools. Please revise this whole paragraph.\r\n- Page 4, second paragraph: delete this sentence \'(e.g. expressed in\r\ndimensions, monetary units, etc.) at the end of the paragraph.\r\n- Section 3, first paragraph: change \'attitude research\' to \'research\r\nabout attitude\'.\r\n- Section 3, first paragraph: change \'\'he pointed out that buildings have always...\' to \'... architects have always...\'\r\n- Page 5, second paragraph: explain more with an example how the flats do not reflect people lifestyle and beliefs. Mentions and example what modification the residents of these flats mad in order to reach best solution for such living space.\r\n- Use \'Express Diagram\' to describe the IFC lifestyle specification. See\r\n[http://www.iai-international.org/Model/documentation/R20/Online_Documents/Documents/IfcGeometryResource.htm] for example.\r\n- Finally, follow the standard referencing method as described in the ASCAAD paper template.\r\n'),(18,6,'T','2007-09-03',5,3,'2,3','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper should be accepted.\r\n\r\n','The produced paper is very interesting and I would like to attend its presentation.\r\n\r\nI would like to bring the attention to several typos that I came across while reading.\r\n Please review the figures mentioned and the numbers associated with them in the text. There might be a mistake or they might be simply need a clarification.\r\n\r\nFinally, the conclusion was short, which is not a bad thing, but it did not mention any negative sides of the research, or any future work. Readers deserve to know about the downsides of this research in order to avoid it.\r\n\r\nMany thanks again for this good paper.\r\n'),(19,27,'T','2007-08-31',2,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'It is a very poor writing paper, which makes the meaning of many sections difficult to understand. There is no clear problematic statement, no relation made between the context \"areas of online communities and forums\" and the proposed software, Design Map, and no example of its application.\r\n\r\n','As written, your research is in a very early stage of development. It needs to be more strongly relate to a clear problematic statement of the \"areas of online communities and forums\" in order to justify the use of your propose piece of software, DesignMap, and the methodology should explain how it will demonstrate that. Also, practical examples should be part of this demonstration. And finally, editing, editing, editing your writing.\r\nPrevious comments about your initial abstract are still in order:\r\nRestate the paper objectives in order to show the specific and benefit of using your system as a design aided. Also, develop the semantic meaning of your graph design process representation.\r\n'),(32,51,'T','2007-09-11',5,4,'2,3','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'The theme is an important subject for revitalizing stock buildings and cities. It is a very clear description. ','The theme is an important subject for revitalizing stock buildings and cities.'),(33,21,'T','2007-09-02',6,3,'2,4','High','Yes','Yes',3,'The research is an original one.\r\n\r\nThe language of the research is very clear, and easily understood.\r\n\r\nThe research opens new perspectives, and discusses new issues in the Case Based Reasoning.\r\n\r\nThe authors are familiar with the subject.\r\n\r\nImplementing MONEO tool in education should be more clarified. Also, using case Based Design by students had the problem of copying (fixation). So, using this method in education should be looked from different point of view.\r\n','Implementing MONEO tool in education should be more clarified. Also, using case Based Design by students had the problem of copying (fixation). So, using this method in education should be looked from different point of view.\r\n'),(36,50,'T','2007-09-08',3,1,'5','High','No','Yes',NULL,'This paper seems to present no scientific argument at the moment. I am not sure what the author means by the \'virtual heritage\'!\r\nIt presents little information and an ambitious end which is providing a \'set of tools\' rather than focusing on a tool for other users/researchers to use.\r\nVery poor level of communication and content, maybe the author can work on providing and reflecting a deeper level of knowledge.','The English language used was poor making it difficuilt to follow your aims and objectives for this work.\r\nThere is no difinition of what is \'virtual hertage\'.\r\nThe work seems to be ambitious in providing \'a set of generic tools\'.\r\nThis abstract needs a lot of work to present the argument in a scientific way\r\nPaper Review:\r\nThe comments on the abstract still remain and have not been addressed.\r\nThere is no scientific coherent analysis between the projects presented.The work appears as a listing of projects without any comparative studies.\r\n'),(37,23,'T','2007-09-04',5,4,'4','Low','Unsure','Yes',4,'Accept.\r\n\r\nThe paper is clear and focused.','Clear, well written paper.\r\n\r\n'),(38,21,'T','2007-09-02',4,2,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The research introduces a new way of looking at the intelligent buildings subject.\r\n\r\nThere should be more connections with the previous literatures.\r\n\r\nThe approach in dealing with the research problem should be clarified, through writing up the research methodology.\r\n','There should be more connections with the previous literatures.\r\n\r\nThe approach in dealing with the research problem should be clarified, through writing up the research methodology.\r\n'),(37,15,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'4','High','No','Yes',4,'The author presented a valid argument but not supported by enough sound literature.\r\nPlease replace the wikipedia cited reference for LCA with a credible/scientific resource','The author presented a valid argument but not supported by enough sound literature.\r\nPlease replace the wikipedia cited reference for LCA with a credible/scientific resource\r\n\r\n'),(33,16,'T','2007-08-30',5,4,'4,5','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'As the authors acknowledge in their paper, this approach has been researched widely and it is not widely use in practice.  The reference to graphical rather than text is acknowledged as a minor contribution but worth of publication.   The evaluation of the system perhaps could be expanded on the presentation.','As the authors acknowledge in their paper, this approach has been researched widely and it is not widely use in practice.  The reference to graphical rather than text is acknowledged as a minor contribution but worth of publication.   The evaluation of the system perhaps could be expanded on the presentation. '),(47,44,'T','2007-08-29',4,4,'5','High','No','No',4,NULL,'The argument behind this paper is interesting, but is not developed in enough detail. Too much of the paper is devoted to the critiques of existing approaches when it would have been better to describe the authors\' contribution. It is somewhat ironic that the illustrative prototype is not presented in a way that makes it easy to understand. The figures showing screenshots are too small to be able to read or interpret. Without being able to see the presentation of the system it is difficult to see how it offers an improvement on existing approaches.\r\n\r\nI would like to see more emphasis on the theoretical aspects of perception, especially looking a ideas outside the field of architecture. Where are the references to, for example, Tufte? There is a growing body of research on information design that is not mentioned here. Perhaps there are alternatives to the traditional CAD presentation techniques that should be investigated. A thorough exploration of end-user needs is missing from this account -- what is the most effective way to present information to different end-users with different needs? How does the technology affect the way in which students learn about architectural precedents? What is the relation to experience of actual buildings?\r\n\r\nThe results of the focus group are not described fully, and the conclusion which is presented is so general to be almost useless. This could have been exploited in a much better way.\r\n\r\nThe paper is generally well written, but could benefit from closer proof-reading. The references also need to be corrected: the reference for Akin et al seems to be messed up -- only Akin\'s surname appears.'),(166,68,'T','2007-09-10',2,4,'5,6','High','No','Unsure',4,'The proposed system architecture is at a very early stage and the originality of the idea is very low. The approach has been undertaken by a number of research projects with more advanced contribution. Also the industry has developed products tackling the approach with adequate details, (see for example the research work by Salford University and the Virtual Construction software, a 5D technology, by Graphisoft Company). The paper is descriptive for an early conceptual idea and doesn’t provide valuable information for the detailed system architecture or the approach for its design and construction stages. A prototype is recommended to be constructed in order to develop and test the conceptual proposal of the system.','The paper covers an interesting topic. However, the proposed system architecture is at very early stage and most of the paper only describes its possible usage and benefits. The paper doesn’t provide valuable information about the detailed system architecture or the approach for its design and construction stages. To make the paper valuable, a prototype is recommended to be constructed in order to develop and test the conceptual proposal of the system.'),(167,34,'T','2007-09-03',4,2,'4','High','No','Yes',4,'•	The misuse of punctuation marks made reading the paper difficult\r\n•	Some figures and their captions are misplaced, not related and superimposed \r\n','•	Section I: Introduction: Re-check all punctuation marks\r\n•	Page 1: 6th line at the end of the Introduction: designing such virtual contexts instead of design such virtual …..\r\n•	Figures (1) and (2) are superimposed\r\n•	The figures and their captions are misplaced\r\n•	Section 3: Purpose behind designing Virtual Environments: this is a very long paragraph, consider using Punctuation marks to make it more readable\r\n•	Do not put titles alone at the bottom of the page, example: Section 3\r\n•	The 3rd reference Wikipedia instead of Wipikidea\r\n•	Fig. (7): Trees instead of Tress\r\n•	Conclusions: Templates are instead of Templates is\r\n'),(167,7,'T','2007-09-03',2,2,'6','High','No','No',4,'-	The research has a new topic and very good images, but there is no a research objective or research methodology. So, results or conclusions can not be expected.\r\n-	The virtual environment has an important role in the design process as it is a design medium. The research objective or question might be: to what extent, or on what point (visual design thinking, form creation, conceptualization, etc.). Or it could be what is the role of three classification mentioned in the research? Can a comparison be made?\r\n','-	The research has a new topic and very good images, but there is no a research objective or research methodology. So, results or conclusions can not be expected.\r\n-	The virtual environment has an important role in the design process as it is a design medium. The research objective or question might be: to what extent, or on what point (visual design thinking, form creation, conceptualization, etc.). Or it could be what is the role of three classification mentioned in the research? Can a comparison be made?\r\n'),(126,42,'T','2007-09-06',1,2,'5','High','No','No',4,'This paper is not fully developed and it should not be considered in ASCAAD 2007. Many issues are just based on assumptions even though the authors are trying to relate to the idea.\r\n','The paper lacks of focus. There are too many issues that the authors trying to highlight.\r\ne.g. : \r\n\r\n1.Issues of architecture and reality versus virtual architecture.\r\n2. Issues on digital architecture application.\r\n3. The samples highlighted (projects that have been awarded or completed) were too broad and diificult to relate to the earlier discussion.\r\n\r\nThis paper is undeveloped in terms of idea, its relation to the theory (context) and the goal for others to share. \r\n\r\nThe are many grammatical errors and \'word jargons\' require definition that certainly need to scope down. I feel that this is more like a \'catalogue\' of projects that the authors did or currently developing. So what\'s is so special compare to others?\r\n\r\n\r\n'),(74,38,'T','2007-09-03',5,4,'3,4','High','Yes','Yes',4,'- Paper experimentally explores architecture form and space design using novel IT methods\r\n- Paper well written, referenced and methodology clear\r\n- Theoretical underpinning of design most desirable but not crucial\r\n- Recommend paper be accepted.','- Good paper and well written overall\r\n- Advise adding more theoretical underpinning regarding the nature of building design as an artistic expression on the one hand and a logical / scientific process on the other but both responding to a human need.'),(91,60,'T','2007-09-01',5,3,'1,4','Low','Unsure','Yes',4,'Clear research path. However, the paper would have benefited from more examples, diagrams and explanation of the core technology.','I believe that more elaboration on the conceptual structure of the system would have been appreciated. Better diagrams and more examples would also have added more value. The concept of the paper is clear though.'),(49,26,'T','2007-08-14',1,3,'1,5','Moderate','No','No',4,'This is a case study without a clear indicator of rigor.  The projects under examination sound interesting, it is unclear what the author would add to what has already been published about the major work.  ','------- Paper review -----------\r\nWhile I was glad to see these innovative examples of Toyo Ito and learn about his design intentions, I did not get much insight about his digital collaboration with his structural engineers.  A more in-depth study of a single building using first-hand observations and interviews would be more valuable that an overview of several projects from secondary sources.\r\n\r\nMuch of the innovation of these buildings would be most apparent in a combination of text, photographs and explanatory diagrams.  Given the limited space, it is difficult to fully explain them with one or two photos.  This study would be more appropriate to a professional periodical.\r\n\r\n\r\n------- Abstract review --------\r\nThis abstract describes how a digital collaboration between Toyo Ito and his structural designers enabled a seamless connection between building to site and building exterior to interior.   Building is united to site thorough organic shapes created by morphogenetic algorithms and a permeable envelope, interior to exterior through the integration of structure and building skin.  The paper needs to explain how digital tools enabled the process, that is, give a simple definition for \"Extended Evolutionary Structural Optimization method\".\r\n\r\nThe abstract has some long, involved sentences (such as the last one), that would be much stronger if it were more direct.  I did not understand either what \"directorial character\" or \"systematizing\" meant.  I assume that the author is finding underlying characteristics for a series of Ito\'s works, in an effort to better understand his design process with his engineers.\r\n\r\nBecause I didn\'t understand the summary sentence, I was unclear what methodology was being used to understand Ito\'s process.  I encourage the author to be methodical in measuring some sort of performance in examining a series of Ito works.\r\n'),(52,15,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'2,3,4','Moderate','Unsure','Unsure',4,'Clear methodology with defined outcomes. Clear statement of contribution. Relevant to the subject domain.\r\n ','Clear methodology with defined outcomes. Clear statement of contribution. Relevant to the subject domain.\r\n'),(56,26,'T','2007-09-07',4,2,'4','Moderate','No',NULL,4,'Paper is much improved, still has jargon that makes it hard to connect to architecture.\r\n\r\nIt looks like the authors did not respond to my previous comment about \"metaphysical simultaneity\". \r\n\r\nPREVIOUS COMMENT:\r\nMusings without much development.  Doesn\'t help me understand anything in a new way.  Uses too much jargon.','PAPER COMMENTS\r\nI was glad to see how the paper developed fromthe abstract - as there is much more to study and understand.  I appreciate the addition of the historic context and the conceptual setting for the project. \r\n\r\nA few things would make the paper stronger.  Clarify what you mean by profile and contour.  I have an idea that profiles are either the edge of a 3d form as seen from a particular view or a 2D silhouette projection of edges onto a picture plane.  I imagine contour lines as isolines from a topographical model but I think of contour drawing as recording edges rather than surfaces.  Due to these ambiguities, I am unclear about \"the relationship between profile and contour\".  \r\n\r\nThe paper\'s language makes it difficult for me to understand the study. I don\'t know what is \"metaphysical simultaneity\" or \"the human image formed by architecture\", so I have a hard time understanding the architectural design implications of the lines of a body in motion.\r\n\r\nI see promise in this work and would like to see it advance with more formal explorations and clearer implications.  Figure 2 is very beautiful and shows the possibilities for form-making from motion capture.  I know that motion capture has been used for a long time in Hollywood and I would be interested to know if communities such as ISEA and Leonardo have published on this topic.  I think Lisa Iwamoto of Berkeley and Julio Bermudez of Utah (Cyberprint) have done strong body visualization projects.\r\n\r\n\r\nPREVIOUS ABSTRACT COMMENTS\r\nI am not clear what work you have done or what is the innovation of your approach.  Looking at the body in motion as a generator of form has been a fascination since Eadweard Muybridge (see Marta Braun\'s Picturing Time, MIT Press).  More recently Kas Oosterhuis in the Netherlands and Lisa Iwamoto, U.C. Berkeley have created interesting projects exploring this theme. Iwamoto used motion capture techniques to generate form.  For the the last several years, the FEIDAD digital architecture competition has featured morphing dynamic spaces:  tracing motion to generate spatial organization.  The topic is interesting; you need to explain what you are adding and why it matters.\r\n\r\nSimplifying and clarifying your language could give your ideas a wider audience.  I have no clue what \"metaphysical simultaneity\" means.\r\n\r\n'),(57,27,'T','2007-08-31',5,3,'3,4','High','Yes','Yes',4,'Excellent paper, well written that brings new pedagogical material in CAAD teaching.','Excellent paper, congratulations, very compelling new teaching methods presented, i.e. use of R.E. and H.S..\r\n'),(60,34,'T','2007-09-02',6,3,'4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper is acceptable. However it is a bit long. \r\nPaper\'s concept is interesting.','•	Internet sites or URLs are not specific; specific URLs should be provided for different references\r\n•	Provide access dates for all Internet sites as they are always updated or deleted\r\n'),(61,18,'T','2007-09-02',2,2,'4','Moderate','No','No',1,'it is good to have work that continues from an earlier confernce.\r\nyet this paper is too confusing and too much in details. \r\nit looses the context and is not understandable.','It is crucial that this paper presents new findings and a clear development from the last paper. It shall hereby point out what are the contributions to the framework and how it can benefit participants of the confernce as well as readers of the paper. It shall also be focused and clear, since further details can be read in the PhD thesis.\r\n\r\nThis paper is to long and too confusing. it lists too many things and does not really bring them into a context.\r\nIt would be better to not be so details, but discuss the matter more broadly and then highlight it with some examples.\r\nit is good to show the work in progress, but it must have a critical distance\r\n'),(67,23,'T','2007-09-04',4,2,'3','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'much improved from abstract submission... a little long winded, could be improved with editing.','Paper goes long in certain areas. Revisions with eye toward editing down for clarity would improve text. \"Finding Shelter in Digital Architecture\" section could be reduced by 1/3.\r\n\r\n\"Finding Solutions in the Ashes\" could be broken into two areas one addressing the conceptual position, the other focused towards the practical implementation.'),(72,38,'T','2007-08-20',5,2,'3','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'Research project VIPA is very interesting for both practice and education, hope the paper will go beyond mere descriptions and provide some valuable analysis / evaluation of the experiences so far. \r\n\r\nAbstarct promises a very good case study on virtual working environment for education and possibly practice as a new medium. Recommend acceptace at this stage.\r\n\r\nPaper review:\r\n\r\n- Acceptable paper\r\n- Lives up to most of promises made in the abstract\r\n- Although part one is descriptive, it is presented within a well informed academic / theoretical framework\r\n- Further elaboraton on the experiment: methodology, feedback... ought to strengthen the rsearch aspect of the paper and add contributive value.','Very interesting research project and promises good cases studies. More clarity on the nature of the scenarios to be included in the paper is important. \r\nIt is expected that the paper presents some analysis / evaluations of the scenarios and their impact on practice and or education. \r\n\r\nPaper review:\r\n\r\n- Would be interesting if the author could expand on the qualitative benefits of the experiment to both students and lecturers as far as the architectural teaching and learning are concerned\r\n- An indication of how the feedback from students and staff was collected ought to be explained\r\n- Paper needs to be re-edited to comply with conference requirements, attention to be payed to:\r\n    + spelling mistakes\r\n    + justification of text\r\n    + Numbering of headings and sub-headings.'),(129,65,'T','2007-09-04',4,4,'3,5','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'The abstract of this paper is making by itself an introduction (which is missing in body of the paper). The author makes the statement  “…we critically study the changes of the process design from the form generation to the fabrication and construction.” but this is not reflected in the document. \r\n\r\nThe main part of this paper consists of  “some commonly used generative techniques of architectural shapes” descriptions which are brief and, due to the illustrations, clear.\r\n\r\nThe conclusion places an interesting discussion on the role of the architect in the digital age architecture. Unfortunately, the text is somewhat confuse, the ideas are referred very quickly and there are grammar, syntax and orthographic errors that involve understanding problems. \r\n\r\nAt the end of the paper there is an item “References” but they are not mentioned in the text.\r\n',NULL),(165,65,'T','2007-09-03',2,3,'5','High','No','No',4,'The main focus of this paper seems to be the description of a teaching methodology which is  not well explained or fully described. The items are not linked and do not reflect or develop the title or the abstract.  The item Background has a weak relation to the rest.','There is an interruption in the second paragraph of item 2 (Background). The Figure 1 is only mentioned in item 6 (future work) but does not appear to be the correct one.  \r\n\r\nAccording to the title and the abstract, I would expect an evaluation of Sketchup as a 3D design toll and a critical view on the impacts of new 3D tools and technologies in architectural concepts and design. Unfortunately, the paper does not reflect the title or develop the abstract. \r\n'),(75,44,'T','2007-08-29',5,1,'1,4','High','Yes','No',4,'I like this very much. I hope the authors can keep the ideas grounded in everyday experience and avoid getting distracted by the philosophy too much.','This is an interesting paper which provides a good introduction to some of the issues surrounding the experience of space (and place). As a conference paper, it offers enough detail. However, there is always scope for improvement and extension. In this paper, I would suggest that it could be interesting to investigate further the relationships between scale, the body and physical effort, along the lines suggested by Merleau-Ponty. To a large extent, the \'distance\' between me and another location is the effort I am required to expend to get from here to there. Different modes of transport will allow me to move with more or less effort. This, for me, is an obvious topic for further exploration.\r\n\r\nIn another paper, it would be interesting and rewarding to introduce bicycle travel as a modern day adjunct to Benjamin\'s flaneur. Cycling adds another set of space/time/effort dimensions to the city. The design of bus stops has received some attention in the past, including examples of electronic bus stops. It would be helpful at least to acknowledge this previous work.\r\n\r\nI like this paper very much, though at times it does become a little too abstract. It would benefit from one more reading to sharpen some of the sentences.'),(76,16,'T','2007-08-30',2,NULL,'6','High',NULL,NULL,NULL,'The authors seem to propose a paper which focuses on the use of virtual technology in science learning. However, it is unclear what the contribution of their theoretical exploration is.  This a very well known and researched theme which has been covered in journals such as Presence by a variety of researchers: technologist, psychologists, etc.  It is therefore unclear what the main contribution is and what methodology has been used\r\n\r\nThis paper has both content and methodological problems.\r\nContent wise reference should have been made to previous research and explain the interest of revisiting this area.\r\nMethodology is not clear and it seems this is just a theoretical essay which has not got good grounding.  A practically based research methodology would have been more valuable.','The authors seem to propose a paper which focuses on the use of virtual technology in science learning. However, it is unclear what the contribution of their theoretical exploration is.  This a very well known and researched theme which has been covered in journals such as Presence by a variety of researchers: technologist, psychologists, etc.  It is therefore unclear what the main contribution is and what methodology has been used.'),(77,38,'T','2007-08-20',5,3,'1,3,4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',1,'Abstract promises an interesting paper if the new technologies, collaborative working environments and new digital tools are included in the review / analysis.\r\n\r\nMore clarity on the objectives of the paper desirable.\r\n\r\nPaper review\r\n\r\nGood paper, it lives up to what was promised in the abstract:\r\n   - Good theoretical background / context with up to date references\r\n   - Novel methodology well explained and practical examples presented\r\n   - Technical issues expertly covered and explained\r\n   - Good paper and recommend acceptance.','The abstract promises a critical review of emerging design / process methodologies and proposes a novel approach to design. If reflected in the paper, this promises interesting. \r\nThe second part of the abstract provides good context but not sure which parts will be reflected / included in the paper.\r\n\r\nPaper review\r\n-A well explored theoretical framework and novel methodologies introduced followed by practical examples of process driven architecture. Good paper.\r\n-Some minor spelling / grammar errors, especially the article \"the\" in some locations.\r\n-A diagramme illustrating the overall functionality of the tools could be usefull and helpful to understand the various mechanisms of the design method?'),(79,53,'T','2007-08-27',4,4,'4','High','No','Unsure',4,'The abstract of paper (it is a copy of the abstract submission only) describe a necessary topic in the field of BIM, but in the paper, the author describes two case studies only. I miss in this context clear solutions, statements or requirements, e.g. a general description of such a framework, criteria’s and effects on the BIM - the integration of communications aspects in process modeling.','I\'m very intrigued by your investigation (LOG). The IFC was and is an imported topic since approx the last decade.\r\nThe abstract is too long (it’s a copy from the first abstract submission only).\r\nThe description of the current situation and the motivation are well written and clear – these reflect the current \"every day\" situation. In the following paragraphs, the author describes two case studies. In the conclusion the author wrote \"... the LOG of BIM primarily depends upon the specific needs of each project.\" That is not really a new stated view. \r\nI miss in this context more clear solutions, statements, requirements etc., e.g. a general description of such a framework, criteria’s and effects on the BIM - the integration of communications aspects in process modeling. '),(80,14,'T','2007-08-30',5,3,'1,4','High','No','Yes',4,'This is an interesting and emerging topic. Its topic matches the conference theme.','Whenever the author strives towards a description of possible practical implementations of responsive public information systems the paper has a say. It would be very interesting to discuss these practical issues and their relevance on the conference. However, the layout needs fine-tuning.'),(81,9,'T','2007-08-29',5,3,'1,3,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,NULL,'The abstract of this paper was already very promising; the full paper is well-written and also worth while to study. A good set of conclusions is included as well. The topic as such suits well within the framework of this conference and elaborates on computational design. \r\n\r\nThe context of this working area has been embedded now (a good set of references has been made available). Furthermore, a description of the working tools and procedures was added as recommended.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately some figures aren\'t attached to the word document (figs 1-4-6), but it can be assumed that a relationship with the textual elements is given.\r\n\r\nIn terms of wording I\'m not convinced that the use of the word \"our\" is optimal, as it is appears roughly 50 times...\r\n\r\nFinally, the length of the abstract could be extended, as it is a bit tight.\r\n'),(82,9,'T','2007-08-30',5,3,'1,3,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'see above','This is a well written paper and the review has been reflected accordingly. The paper itself is in an appropriate way embedded in the context of distance learning with a special focus on the use of SecondLife. The survey is based on a good set of research questions and the procedure itself is elaborated in an adequate way. This papers adds on existing experiences and can be regarded as rather useful for other, who intend to experiment in a similar direction. As such the potential and limitations are well displayed. All in all this paper keeps the attention of the reader from the beginning till the end.\r\n\r\nMinor remark concerning the keywords: \"Massive Multi-User Online 3D Virtual Environments\" is a bit longish and it may be considered to split this up.\r\n\r\nConcerning the tutor: It seems that the job of tutor is referring to a UK-system and not every reader my be 100% familiar with this. It could be advantageous to work this out. \r\nI seems that in the described case exactly one tutor was responsible. Or was there a change in personnel during the studio (i.e. did the same person introduce the students and stayed afterwards by means of SecondLife in touch with them?!\r\n\r\n'),(86,19,'T','2007-09-01',4,5,'5','High','No','Yes',NULL,'the author has a certain experience in the field. The work needs to be submitted as an experience not reporting his work as he writes: this report .......\r\n\r\nIt is a report documenting a certain work without new point of view or experiences.\r\n\r\nIt is a typical GIS work and excersice not an outstanding one.\r\nit is up to you to accept or refuse such a paper.\r\nAs i ticked the (Marginal Tend to Accept:) to give the author a chance to modify work.\r\n','The abstract shows a previous experience of the author in the GIS and conservation fields.\r\nIt would be appreciated to share the experience and way of thinking than reporting the work itself.\r\n\r\nthere is a big difference between report and a research paper. This is a report and you have to rewrite it to be a research work with references to theoritical or practical  basis and same experiences all over the world or the region.\r\nWe have to know other experiences. \r\n\r\nI want to reminding you with the comment i wrote before when the abstract was reviewed [It would be appreciated to share the experience and way of thinking than reporting the work itself].\r\n\r\n'),(86,14,'T','2007-08-30',3,4,'5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The paper misses a clear description of its main topic, which is the Decision Support System.','This is a well written paper. It is fluent to read and its content is made clear by the author. However, it still misses a description of the functionality of its key component which is the Decision Support System. Maybe the author uses the term DDS in a manner different from how it is commonly used. '),(90,54,'T','2007-08-25',6,3,'1,4','Moderate','Unsure','Unsure',2,NULL,'add the reference at page 3 line 10\r\n'),(13,3,'T','2007-09-13',4,1,'3','Low','No','No',4,NULL,'A good paper describing methods and exercises used to enrich students’ creativity and design idea exploration. The abstract needs to be summarized and focus on what the paper is about, instead of being general. The paper length is too long and needs to be less than 16 pages. Refer to ASCAAD 2007 conference paper submission template and guide. The paper has benefits to reader especially educators and future students.'),(20,3,'T','2007-09-12',3,1,'5','Low','No','Yes',4,'I could not give critical feedback on this paper as it is out of my expertise.','the abstract mentions that theories reviewed will be implemented in VIA experiment. But where is this experiment in the paper, I could not find it. Without it the paper is just a survey in the topic!'),(93,23,'T','2007-09-04',1,4,'5','High','No','Unsure',4,'Content lack completeness, intellectual rigor or value and/or writing should be improved.','Improperly formatted paper, missing illustrations. \r\n\r\nMore specificity about the interdependence and divergent issues of \"design thinking\" through drawing (physical/CADD) would improve the paper.\r\n\r\nCasual attitude to references, lack of specificity to factual information.\r\n\r\nMore discussion of curricular interests beyond software applications or particular vendors would improve paper'),(99,3,'T','2007-09-01',2,NULL,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'I am rejecting this paper as it does not contain real practical or research base. There is actually little benefit for the reader if he/she wants to learn about BIM and sustainable design!!','it is clear that the paper lacks any literature review in association what the author is presenting. The topic of linking BIM and sustainable design in teaching is challenging but the content of this work does not reflect that. Sustainable design discussed here should reach to critical topics such as how students were able to use BIM technology to produce green design and produce architectural products minimizing environmental impact and energy consumption. The teaching course should use BIM for environmental analysis such as, orientation of the building, daylight levels analysis, overshadowing, energy and resource consumption. I am including further remarks on this paper to improve it:\r\n- Please use building instead of difficult wording like ‘edifice’\r\n- The organization of the paper is not easy to follow.\r\n- Use good size of images and explain their purpose of using them as illustration within the text.\r\n- All section provided after the conclusion are irrelative and hard to make sense of them and relate to the topic.\r\n- Section ‘1.2’: is too long and is better broken down into smaller sections. Please avoid long paragraphs.\r\n- Page ‘4’, second paragraph: it is not clear if the students were asked to design a standard house or remodeling an actual housing schemes provided by the Department of Housing.\r\n- Page ‘4’, fourth paragraph: is it true that standard five to six bedroom house contains six different bathrooms. I understood that the software (presumably ArchiCAD) was used to show how to reduce the number of vertical piping shafts? Explain how? Was this really a sustainable design challenge!!!\r\n- Page ‘4’, paragraph ‘5’: Did you mean ArchiCAD ‘Zone Stamp’ instead of ‘Room Stamp’. Please explain to the reader what useful parametric information found in the Zone Stamp.\r\n- Page ‘4, paragraph ‘6’: I never heard of ‘Solar Geometry’ before. Perhaps the author means the wording such as ‘… the impact of geometrical solar devices (e.g. horizontal/vertical shading devices).\r\n- Page ‘5’, paragraph ‘2’: is there a missing reference for Bruno Taut?\r\n- Section 1.3: why suddenly discuss IFC file format and how it relates to sustainable design? As a reader I was looking forward to see gbXML file format!! In this section use proper referencing to research such as your Master thesis.\r\n- Generally the English language is very weak and make sure to spell check.\r\n'),(98,50,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'2','High','No','Yes',3,'Acceptable as an abstract but the paper needs to confirm knoweldge in area of validating building performance simulation results by actual measured data.\r\n\r\nAcceptable paper after modifications','Although there is a considerable body of knowledge in the area, further work to confirm the credibility of environmental simulation tools is still needed.\r\nThe abstract needs to explain the context of the case study.\r\nThe breakdown of the meter readings needs to be explained.\r\nPaper review:\r\nThe paper adds to general intuition on the accuracy of modelling softwares.\r\nThe paper is a good effort but can be improved by addressing a few issues:\r\n1-Consistency of the units used in expressing energy consumption. It is preferable to use the metric system. in fig 3&4 units are expressed in BTU then in KWH throughout the paper.\r\n2- the breakdown of the metering is still not explained although it appears in Figure 16.\r\n3-From table 2 and figures 14-17 there is something called (Penn) that needs to be explained further in the text.\r\n4- Aligned concluions to findings, as table 2 indicates the difference between the metered data and ECOTECT as the least difference between metered and simulated energy consumption, but the conclusions seem to indicate that Energy plus is more accurate.'),(111,52,'T','2007-09-02',4,3,'4','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'Adequate paper although seems to still miss some critical discussions and theoretically the research question remains out of touch with contemporary curatorial practice.','Would have liked to see more qualitative questions to guide the research and evaluation. Subsequently the conclusion is rather brief. Could you include any further qualitative discussions from talking to participants?'),(119,7,'T','2007-08-27',2,3,'6','High','No','Yes',4,'-	The paper introduces a rule based in designing Mamluk Mosques in Cairo (Egypt). Although the objective and methodology are sound, they do not have a direct relation to the conference concern.','-	The paper introduces a rule based in designing Mamluk Mosques in Cairo (Egypt). Although the objective and methodology are sound, they do not have a direct relation to the conference concern.'),(125,38,'T','2007-08-21',4,1,'4,5','High','No','No',4,'Not certain if the paper is very relevant to the theme of the conference.\r\n\r\nAcceptance, in my opinion, hinges on clarification of my question to the author (see Comments for the Author).\r\n\r\nCannot find a suitable session for this paper.\r\n\r\nPaper review:\r\n\r\n- Recommend accept provided all modifications are met(see comments for the author)\r\n- Seems a good review paper but for the wrong conference, ought to be climate change or sustainable design coinference???\r\n- Clearly the paper is a student one as part of an ongoing research (PhD or similar) and it should be accepted as such i.e. ongoing student research. ','Abstract focuses on modular construction design and promises a good piece of research on the subject. But it does not clarify the type of simulation which is the most relevant to the theme of the conference. \r\n\r\nDoes simulation mean a mere 3D drawing or an element of evaluation using digital tools? the latter would be most appropriate.\r\n\r\nPaper review:\r\n\r\n- Paper should focus more in VR as an evaluation tool and at least demonstrate a coherent methodology / strategy if work is still in progress\r\n- It is essential that the paper reviews existing VR methodologies and applications in the field, and be used as a platform to build upon\r\n- Reduce the paper length by condensing the climate change sections which are over detailed being not the core subject of the paper\r\n- Paper needs to be re-edited for:\r\n     + spelling errors\r\n     + margins\r\n     + justification\r\n     + general formating to comply with conference requirements '),(128,6,'T','2007-09-03',5,3,'2,3','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper is ready to be published. if more was added to the experiment, then it will be better.\r\n','I would like to congratulate the author on this paper. It was much developed compared to the abstract.\r\nContent is comprehensive and the experiment is interesting.\r\nI would like to see more figures and screen shots to elaborate on the experiment.\r\n\r\nCertain quotes were not properly referenced, particularly with Sutherland and Hortsmann. I expected page numbers.\r\nSince this paper is going to be published in black and white, it would be wise to include figures with high contrast and shades of grey especially when there is a comparison.'),(150,7,'F',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL),(136,26,'T','2007-08-14',4,2,'4','Moderate','No',NULL,NULL,'PAPER NOTE\r\nWith one picture, I see why this author was going on and on about sound.  It still needs some work to develop the conceptual consequences for architecture, but at least now there is a reason to include it in the conference.  See if you can beat up the author to make it more legible.\r\n\r\n\r\nABSTRACT NOTE\r\nThis paper seems to have little content and lots of attitude. I am not a theorist and I have a very low tolerance for academic jargon and garbled syntax.  So this paper sets off all my alarm bells. There is no evidence that the author actually has experience with computers in architecture.','----------------- Paper review -----\r\nI was very glad to see the development of this project with the sound visualization example.  It has a beautiful form and interesting implications.  While the abstract alone was too theoretical for the conference, paired with the technical experiment it has a reason for being included.\r\n\r\nYou can strengthen the paper by establishing your interest in creating architectural form from sound from the very outset.  Otherwise it is unclear why you are going on about sound.  The more you can connect the discussions about music and history to architecture, the stronger the first two sections will read.  For example, what is the architectural equivalent of noise, silence and John Cage?  Explain the advantages of generating an inhabitable form from sound rather than a 3D form that is primarily visual.\r\n\r\nCertainly many other people have used natural data as form generators.  You need to cite the best examples and say how your approach differs.  You might have interest in Julio Bermudez of Utah\'s Information Visualization.\r\nhttp://faculty.arch.utah.edu/people/faculty/julio/res.htm\r\n\r\nDiscuss the possibilities for your work in the missing Section 4. We need to learn more about the significance and consequences of your project - how could capturing fleeting \r\nsounds create useful forms?  What do you see the application of the software? it could clearly create interactive virtual environments but could it also generate meaningful built form?  Could you creating 3D forms of sound go beyond being a cute toy to something more meaningful?  The earlier parts of the paper show you have large aspirations for this paper.\r\n\r\nYou also need to re-write the abstract so that it really explains what you did.  Glad to see some of the language is simpler. Please remember that many of the readers may have learned English as a foreign language.  \r\n\r\nKeep going - it shows promise!\r\n\r\n----------------- Abstract review ---------------\r\nWith effort I can understand the meaning of parts of this abstract but I have difficulty seeing how they hang together.  To paraphrase:\r\n\r\n1. Computers are well suited for describing and enabling the ever-changing exceptions in daily life routines.\r\n2.  Since computers shape the construction of buildings, audio and other media, we should study the use of computers in dealing with many complex sources of architectural design.\r\n3.  Studying the similarities between architecture and sound production could lead to an architectural design strategy that is more effective in addressing variability.\r\n\r\nYou need to make a stronger argument that digital production tools in one realm are analgous to those in another.  Once upon a time, we could say that computer tools forced a prescribed, rigid way of working.  But now there are many different ways of working digitally, so it is impossible to generalize on the effect.  The abstract has so little specificity, that it\'s hard to see its reasoning.\r\n\r\nSimplifying and clarifying your language could give your ideas a wider audience.  Several sentences (such as the final one) are hard to understand because they contain so many phrases.  It would also help if you define obscure words such as \"pataphysics\"; your audience would appreciate reading your interpretation of the word.\r\n'),(137,52,'T','2007-09-02',2,2,'4,5','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'Despite the warning on the packet - poetic paper - it struggles with a structure and language to support a specific research question or inquiry. You must address your own promise to the reader of delivering the three stages stated in section 2 (media) or is this the introduction. References remain poorly used and general rather than critical and rigourous. ','Despite the warning on the packet - poetic paper - it struggles with a structure and language to support a specific research question or inquiry. You must address your own promise to the reader of delivering the three stages stated in section 2 (media) or is this the introduction. References remain poorly used and general rather than critical and rigourous. '),(148,29,'T','2007-08-31',2,4,'3,5','High','No','Yes',4,'1. The case study mentioned does not conclude any details regarding the extent that the simulation tools can contribute in illumination distribution of urban space in early design stages. \r\n\r\n2. Writing is very poor and hardly understood in many parts. As the right terminology for lighting design field are not properly used. For example:\r\n\"Daily lighting\": should be “Day light”\r\n\"Optical\": should be \"Visual\" and so on\r\n\r\n3. The research is just a shallow introduction to the simulation tools that shows examples of the work flow and changing materials and settings (e.g. using “ies” files and so); that what any simulation tool is intended to do for more than 10 years. Moreover, lighting schemes “decisions” based on those realistic visualizations are not discussed according to specific criteria and the validity of the simulation tools are not tested.  Thus the paper doesn\'t add any merits to the field.','1. The case study does not show clear advantages of using a specific simulation tool rather than using another one.\r\n\r\n2. The Light planning part is well introduced.\r\n\r\n3. The research, in the simulation tools part 3, is just a shallow explanation of the capabilities of simulation tools that any user knows. Such capabilities, regardless their limitations, are listed clearly in such software’s manuals and tutorials as well.  \r\n\r\n4. It would be useful if the case study in hand showed some achievements or even drawbacks that would help in developing the software. On the other hand a \"push over the limits\" of the simulation tools to support decision making in lighting design would be appreciated as well.\r\n'),(147,17,'T','2007-09-02',5,3,'4','High','No','Yes',NULL,'•	Papers 147 and 24 should be put together in the same session (in case both are accepted).','•	The presented work is very well put together; however, some sentences need revision (due to spelling, grammar or structure mistakes) to ensure clear readability. Section 3.2: “It can be defined as (a) any freely… same section, last paragraph: “To make continues customization and reuse possible in a dwelling, there are five types...” I’m not sure, if this should be re-written as follows: “To make continuous customization and reuse possible of a dwelling, there are five types…” Such mistakes are frequently found all through the paper, taking care of them will increase the value of the presented work.\r\n•	The ASCAAD required layout is not fully considered in part 2; some texts are in size 11 and others in 12.\r\n•	The different figures are referred to within the text. However, more elaborated explanations of those figures are highly recommended.\r\n•	It might be advisable to add an example that represents the full scenario of the design process. Such an example will clear out the different tasks of the client, the architect, and the manufacturer; as well as pointing out when is each of those tasks taking place. '),(145,48,'T','2007-09-12',4,5,'3','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'I\'m not very confident that we should include this paper in the conference. The paper presents a simple application of a case study using Ecotec. May be we can ask the author to present a demonstration of Ecotec during the conference and not in presenting his paper. May be the demo will make it more attractive paper and bring interest within the audience.','The orientation of buildings and its impact on the internal environment has been studied for long time using different methods and softwares.\r\nThe case study and the application used are interesting as they add extra information to what is known from classical tools. \r\nThe use of frontal abacus projection was used for long time and then replaced by the orthogonal projections which contribute to a better understanding and add more clarity, may be you can use them instead.\r\nThe graphs generated by Ecotec, could be presented in larger formats for a better and clear reading.\r\nThe internal environment is highly influenced by 3 components (the external environment conditions, the construction specifications and the internal layout), this second component was not taken into account as it should.\r\n'),(145,50,'T','2007-09-08',2,NULL,'5','High','No','No',4,'There isn\'t a bulk of knowelge on building performace in climatic regions such as Pakistan.\r\nThis paper is poorly presented and the author demonstrates little in depth knowledge in the subject','Interesting application. Please do not use abbreviations such as w.r.t in abstract or body of the paper.\r\nYour research aim is clear but you need to revise the English language to impove clarity.\r\nPaper Review:\r\nThis paper needs major ammendments\r\n1-The references provided are not found in the text. Environmental modelling is well covered in literature, key texts on modelling have not been reviewed.\r\n2- Poor presentation of analysis and explanation of the base case.\r\n3- Generic conclusions that undermine the possible outcome of this paper.'),(149,27,'T','2007-08-31',5,4,'2,3','High','No','Yes',4,'From the initial abstract, much better focus, overall paper structure and clarity really improved. The abstract is missing.\r\n','Good paper, the introduction should include something about its content, and section 2 and 3 are missing a good liaison. Your abstract is missing.\r\n\r\n'),(150,42,'T','2007-08-26',5,4,'2','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'good paper.','The overall explanation is clear and the intention of the paper mainly focus on the results or case studies carried out on distance architectural learning test.\r\n\r\nInteresting discussion should consider on the students\' participation in the \'distance/collaborative learning environment\' in gaining architectural knowledge.'),(151,34,'T','2007-09-02',4,3,'3','High','No','Yes',4,'•	The paper’s conclusions are predictable\r\n•	The paper presents little addition to knowledge in CAAD education\r\n\r\n','•	Page 5: 3rd line: did not learn instead of learned\r\n•	Page 6: Table 1: Issue # 2: was there an instead of was an there\r\n•	Page 9: Conclusions: 	* Last sentence in page: results show instead of shows\r\n* Different alternatives in the conceptual design phase of design (and delete: until the communication to the construction site)\r\n	Page 9: There is no fig. (3) despite it is being referenced in the text\r\n•	Provide titles for the “Four Blocks” from the paragraph in page 7\r\n•	Page 10: References: 3rd reference: Greece instead of Grece\r\n'),(140,19,'T','2007-08-31',4,5,'1','High','No','Yes',NULL,'the abstract is quite clear and shows that the author has good knowledge in field of GIS\r\n\r\nThe full paper shows that it was a working paper submitted in a seminar before and is submitted here as a research paper. There is a lack of experience in writting research work. e. g. in writting in text selecting references and their quality.\r\n','The abstract is clear and specific.\r\n\r\nThe research would be completed.\r\n\r\nFirst, there is no introduction to tell us about the problem definition. There is no clear written objective objective  for that research and methodology.\r\n\r\nReferences are few and fragile (only five or six references)\r\n\r\nFigures numbers within text would be reviewed to match figure number and the specified figure.\r\n\r\ne.g. &#1575;&#1604;&#1585;&#1587;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1610;&#1575;&#1606;&#1610; &#1601;&#1610; &#1575;&#1604;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (20) &#1610;&#1592;&#1607;&#1585; &#1578;&#1585;&#1575;&#1580;&#1593; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1587;&#1575;&#1581;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1576;&#1606;&#1610;&#1577; &#1605;&#1606; &#1581;&#1608;&#1575;&#1604;&#1610; 1450000 &#1605;2 &#1573;&#1604;&#1609; 900000&#1605;2&#1608;&#1584;&#1604;&#1603; &#1593;&#1604;&#1609; &#1605;&#1583;&#1575;&#1585; &#1575;&#1604;&#1587;&#1606;&#1608;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1587;&#1576;&#1593;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1608;&#1604;&#1609; &#1604;&#1593;&#1605;&#1604;&#1610;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1606;&#1605;&#1610;&#1577;. &#1579;&#1605; &#1578;&#1576;&#1583;&#1571; &#1601;&#1610; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1575;&#1593;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1583;&#1585;&#1610;&#1580;&#1610; &#1581;&#1578;&#1609; &#1606;&#1607;&#1575;&#1610;&#1577; &#1605;&#1585;&#1575;&#1581;&#1604; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1606;&#1605;&#1610;&#1577; &#1576;&#1593;&#1583; &#1582;&#1605;&#1587;&#1577; &#1608;&#1593;&#1588;&#1585;&#1610;&#1606; &#1593;&#1575;&#1605;&#1575;.\r\n\r\nWritten twenty five years development although they started from 2005 till 2025 (twenty years only)\r\n\r\nfull sections (e.g. . &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593; &#1580;&#1576;&#1604; &#1582;&#1606;&#1583;&#1605;&#1577;: (&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; 13 &#1608; 14). (&#1601;&#1602;&#1610;&#1607;&#1548; &#1593;&#1576;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1585;&#1581;&#1605;&#1606; &#1593;&#1576;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1602;&#1575;&#1583;&#1585;&#1548; 2004) just figures and reference without any description for the projects.\r\n\r\nWriting references should be consitant\r\n\r\n&#1601;&#1575;&#1610;&#1586; &#1586;&#1607;&#1610;&#1585; &#1548; 2004&#1605; &#1548; &#1575;&#1604;&#1580;&#1586;&#1569; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1608;&#1604; - &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1602;&#1585;&#1610;&#1585; &#1575;&#1604;&#1606;&#1607;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610; &#1604;&#1604;&#1605;&#1582;&#1591;&#1591; &#1575;&#1604;&#1607;&#1610;&#1603;&#1604;&#1610; &#1604;&#1605;&#1583;&#1610;&#1606;&#1577; &#1605;&#1603;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1603;&#1585;&#1605;&#1577;. &#1575;&#1604;&#1607;&#1610;&#1574;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1604;&#1610;&#1575; &#1604;&#1578;&#1591;&#1608;&#1610;&#1585; &#1605;&#1606;&#1591;&#1602;&#1577; &#1605;&#1603;&#1577;.\r\n\r\n&#1601;&#1602;&#1610;&#1607;&#1548; &#1593;&#1576;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1585;&#1581;&#1605;&#1606; &#1593;&#1576;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1602;&#1575;&#1583;&#1585;&#1548; 2004 &#1605; . &#1578;&#1602;&#1585;&#1610;&#1585; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593; &#1578;&#1591;&#1608;&#1610;&#1585; &#1580;&#1576;&#1604; &#1582;&#1606;&#1583;&#1605;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1575;&#1576;&#1578;&#1583;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610; &#1548; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593; &#1578;&#1591;&#1608;&#1610;&#1585; &#1580;&#1576;&#1604; &#1582;&#1606;&#1583;&#1605;&#1577;.\r\n\r\nyou have to follow the conference format\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n'),(42,3,'T','2007-09-09',5,3,'3,4','Moderate','Yes','Yes',4,'very good paper with practical development of AR approach with great use in architecture. The paper should be accepted.','Very impressive written paper and research ideas are well explained. The paper provides a logical relationship between the underlying theories in this field and the development in the research. I definitely see future use of such approach in interior design and refurbishment of historical buildings. I look forward to see your presentation in the conference. Finally, please make sure to include the missing references in the paper.'),(116,3,'T','2007-09-09',4,3,'4','High','No','No',4,NULL,'Good paper developing metaphors about the characteristics of virtual and real environments with a practical implementation in real life. \r\n\r\nGeneral notes:\r\n- Please do not exceed the paper length 16 pages. \r\n- It is possible to cut-short the literature review to focus on main theories related to your investigation.\r\n- Page 12, first paragraph: Can you give an example of how a user might violate the ‘rules of the discourse’\r\n'),(139,6,'T','2007-09-12',1,1,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'When reading the paper it seemed really familiar and similar to a previous MIT scholar\'s paper I have read before. When I got back to the MIT paper, I found that this paper largely copied parts of the MIT paper without any referencing. \r\nThe paper I am talking about is available online:\r\nhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V2K-4J6W768-1&_user=809099&_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000043939&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=809099&md5=fb4e8285c6ca3a6789ba6f0b3e1e333c\r\n\r\nI strongly suggest the paper to be turned down as it will be extremely embarrassing if published in the conference proceedings.\r\n','The paper introduces major statements without any support whatsoever. I suggest introducing references.'),(163,6,'T','2007-09-14',4,2,'5','High','No','Unsure',4,'The paper is ok, but is not so strong. \r\nIt might be suitable to add it with a strong technical demonstration.\r\n\r\n','Usability is not he main requirement for every system. The experience behind it is the most important factor. \r\n\r\nThe concentration in this paper is on the literature review behind the project, while it would have been more interesting if more was mentioned about the actual project itself. \r\n\r\nIf accepted, the conference presentation should have a strong technical demonstration.\r\n\r\nThere are several typos. Please adhere to the template and font size.\r\n\r\nThe references are not in Harvard style. Please comply.'),(40,10,'T','2007-09-06',5,2,'3','Moderate','No','Yes',NULL,'Although I am not the expert in the area of CAM, I approve the paper as is. It is a growing area of interest and several well-establsihed AE firms in USA started to address it with relation to large scale highrise projects using tools as CATIA, RHINO','It is very interesting topic.\r\n\r\nHowever, the author is missing very critical part which the impact of using CAM tools (e.g. CATIA,Rhino,etc) in the design process itself as well the designer perception of the design methodology and the role of architects.\r\n\r\n\r\n-------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nSeveral symposiums and educational programs have recently addressed this subject from different perspectives. I would kindly request the author to review the following links: \r\n\r\nYale University - Special Event: BUILDING (IN) THE FUTURE Recasting Labor in Architecture:\r\nhttp://www.yale.edu/opa/newsr/06-10-05-01.all.html\r\nhttp://allthingsbim.blogspot.com/2006/11/building-in-future-yale-part-4.html\r\n\r\nProduct Architecture Lab at Stevens Institute of Technology - USA: \r\nhttp://www.stevens.edu/engineering/product-architecture/\r\n\r\nDesign and Manufacturing Institute at Stevens Institute of Technology - USA: \r\nhttp://www.dmi.stevens-tech.edu/\r\n\r\nDigital Project – Gehry Technologies:\r\nhttp://www.gehrytechnologies.com/products-product-engineering-optimizer.html\r\n\r\nThe title of the paper should be more specific and modified to reflect the focus and the expected outcome described by the author (e.g. production strategies, its reflection on design processes, and the influence of new materials). \r\n'),(156,7,'F',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL),(165,3,'T','2007-09-13',2,1,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'A weak paper and does not contribute with new knowledge to the conference or the field.','The aim of this paper is to describe a course for teaching digital design and ICT technologies to architectural students. The author is not developing a new approach. In fact, many literature and authors have elaborated even more on the structure of architectural curriculum. Many readers already know that SketchUp is a very useful tool so what’s new?!\r\n\r\nGeneral Comments:\r\n- Page ‘2’ second paragraph: when you mention the case study in Heathrow Airport the reader expects to see it illustrated in Figure 1. Otherwise, mention and explain Figure 1 within the body of text.\r\n\r\n'),(88,6,'T','2007-08-30',4,5,'3,5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The the experimentation is very interesting, but there is no real theoretical background.\r\nThe presentation might be joined with other odd presentations.\r\nI would accept, but expect the comments to be taken into consideration.\r\n\r\n','\r\nMany thanks for the interesting paper and experiment.\r\n\r\nThe introduction does not contain any theoretical background to the investigations within the same field, or reference to previous work leading up to this work. A little bit of context would be of a great help to situate your paper within the general field and make us aware of its place.\r\n\r\nIn Introduction, paragraph 2 sentence one, I expected a reference of some sort to support the sentence. This could have been avoided if the intro had a context of research.\r\n\r\nPage 4 under subheading (Collision Avoidance), the second sentence seems to have a verb problem. Please review.\r\n\r\nIn the application section, page 6, the second paragraph describes the images assuming they will be coloured. Will you please change that taking into consideration that the final proceedings will be in black and white?\r\n\r\nCaptions of figures 3 and 4 are mere repetition of the text. Since the figures are not situated far from the text mentioning them, it is better to either remove the captions or make them shorter.\r\n\r\nText under the subheading (Discussion) should be moved to section 4.(future work), and discussion should include critique of the experiment and certain elements within it and whether they satisfied the hypothesis or not.\r\nThe discussion should be longer as it will contain the outcome of the exercise carried in this paper.\r\n\r\nIf the paper is accepted, a strong technical demonstration of it is expected in the conference.\r\n'),(90,52,'T','2007-09-02',5,5,'3','High','Unsure','Unsure',4,'Good paper. Well developed and clearly understands the technology and its capacities and potentials.','Good paper'),(118,7,'T','2007-08-27',3,2,'1','High','No','No',4,'Designing a computer application that aids designers by generating Islamic geometrical motifs based on the magic squares, is not enough as a contribution. The research should introduce or investigate the questions of: are these motifs applicable in architectural design or urban planning? If yes do Architects or urban planners find them helpful? And are there case studies? Otherwise, what is the purpose of generating this huge number of forms?','Designing a computer application that aids designers by generating Islamic geometrical motifs based on the magic squares, is not enough as a contribution. The research should introduce or investigate the questions of: are these motifs applicable in architectural design or urban planning? If yes do Architects or urban planners find them helpful? And are there case studies? Otherwise, what is the purpose of generating this huge number of forms?'),(157,7,'T','2007-08-30',4,3,'6','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,NULL,NULL),(22,6,'T','2007-09-03',2,1,'5','High','No','Unsure',4,'I was expecting more of this paper, but I believe it has nothing at all.\r\nJust the social implications of computers in our digital age. No architecture. It would have been much more interesting if the author started talking about his intended course. \r\n\r\nIt also seems that the paper was much longer and the author shortened it for this conference.\r\nI suggest to reject.\r\n','The paper is highly theoretical although it mentions the course at the end.\r\nIt would have been great if the author talked more about that course in its infancy.\r\nIt is not clear how PIXEL in the title of this paper relates to the content.\r\n\r\nThe researcher asserts that Dasein is the original place of intelligibility, while according to Heidegger it is the entity of being. I am looking for a justification for this assertion.\r\nThe definition of Critical sub-systems does not seem to be applied to any other part of the paper.\r\n\r\nThe social aspects of digital age are much more in the centre of focus of this paper as opposed to the architectural implication or even virtual environments implication. Perhaps each comparison and example could be supported by extra architectural one.\r\n'),(35,63,'F','2007-08-31',5,4,'2','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,NULL,'Good practical paper and the author should focus on the value of using such an approach and how we can measure this.'),(35,60,'T','2007-09-01',5,5,'2,4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'a very good documentation of the design process using parametric geometry. Author did not comply with the template.\r\nthe idea is clear, and the presentation is good.','a very good documentation of the design process using parametric geometry.'),(82,65,'T','2007-09-04',5,5,'2,3','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'This is a well written, well documented paper on an interesting experiment: the evaluation of a web-based environment (SecondLife) as a “place” for virtual encounters and discussion of student´s architectural designs. The author shows a strong background and clear and consistent methods.  ',NULL),(87,64,'T','2007-08-31',4,4,'4','High','No','No',4,'The paper is an abstraction of the self-observation and the experiences of the author (p 22). \r\nThe conclusions for urban form are too scarce. \r\nThe phenomenon of a \"Jump Box\" is not really new,\r\nand the use of digital techniques is evident and already introduced. ',NULL),(97,60,'T','2007-09-02',4,2,'4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'not enough proof of concept.','technically, how will you compare the photo information with the BIM model?'),(101,34,'T','2007-09-02',4,5,'3','High','No','No',4,'•	The papers needs editing as it contains plenty of spelling mistakes and wrong punctuations\r\n•	The paper is addressing \"Digital Tools\" more than “Virtual Architecture”; the paper’s name would better be: &#1578;&#1591;&#1576;&#1610;&#1602;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1583;&#1608;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1585;&#1602;&#1605;&#1610;&#1577; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1593;&#1605;&#1575;&#1585;&#1609; – &#1605;&#1579;&#1575;&#1604; &#1593;&#1604;&#1609; &#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1605;&#1583;&#1610;&#1606;&#1577; &#1580;&#1575;&#1605;&#1593;&#1610;&#1577;\r\n•	Some of the figures are NOT readable, others lack information\r\n•	All references are NOT actually referenced inside the text, they lack accuracy in their writing and they are not complete.\r\n•	There is no match between the content of fig. (2) and its explanation in the text regarding the Physical programs\r\n•	Not all physical programs are emphasized or addressed in the same way\r\n','•	&#1571;&#1594;&#1604;&#1576; &#1601;&#1602;&#1585;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1608;&#1585;&#1602;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1610;&#1577; &#1578;&#1581;&#1578;&#1575;&#1580; &#1605;&#1585;&#1575;&#1580;&#1593;&#1577; &#1573;&#1605;&#1604;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1608;&#1605;&#1585;&#1575;&#1580;&#1593;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1600; Punctuation\r\n•	&#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1604;&#1582;&#1589;: &#1578;&#1585;&#1580;&#1605;&#1577; \"&#1575;&#1604;&#1582;&#1591;&#1608;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605;&#1610;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1601;&#1589;&#1610;&#1604;&#1610;&#1577;\" &#1573;&#1604;&#1609; Design Methods Representation &#1607;&#1609; &#1578;&#1585;&#1580;&#1605;&#1577; &#1594;&#1610;&#1585; &#1589;&#1581;&#1610;&#1581;&#1577;\r\n•	&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (1) : &#1610;&#1608;&#1580;&#1583; &#1576;&#1610;&#1575;&#1606; &#1606;&#1575;&#1602;&#1589; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1587;&#1578;&#1591;&#1610;&#1604; &#1571;&#1587;&#1601;&#1604; &#1575;&#1604;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604;\r\n•	&#1605;&#1591;&#1604;&#1608;&#1576; &#1578;&#1608;&#1581;&#1610;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1587;&#1605;&#1610;&#1575;&#1578; &#1584;&#1575;&#1578; &#1606;&#1601;&#1587; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1593;&#1606;&#1609;: &#1605;&#1579;&#1575;&#1604;: &#1606;&#1592;&#1575;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1608;&#1575;&#1604;&#1609; &#1589;&#1601;&#1581;&#1577; 3 – &#1608;&#1606;&#1592;&#1575;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1581;&#1604;&#1602;&#1609; &#1589;&#1601;&#1581;&#1577; 12\r\n•	&#1576;&#1588;&#1571;&#1606; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1610;&#1575;&#1606;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1585;&#1578;&#1576;&#1591;&#1577; &#1576;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (2) &#1610;&#1601;&#1590;&#1604; &#1603;&#1578;&#1575;&#1576;&#1577; &#1593;&#1606;&#1608;&#1575;&#1606; &#1604;&#1603;&#1604; &#1601;&#1602;&#1585;&#1577; &#1576;&#1583;&#1604;&#1575;&#1611; &#1605;&#1606; &#1575;&#1587;&#1578;&#1582;&#1583;&#1575;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1585;&#1576;&#1593;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1604;&#1608;&#1606;&#1577; &#1581;&#1610;&#1579; &#1571;&#1606;&#1607;&#1575; &#1604;&#1606; &#1578;&#1603;&#1608;&#1606; &#1605;&#1593;&#1576;&#1585;&#1577; &#1601;&#1609; &#1581;&#1575;&#1604;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1591;&#1576;&#1575;&#1593;&#1577; &#1594;&#1610;&#1585; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1604;&#1608;&#1606;&#1577;\r\n•	&#1578;&#1608;&#1580;&#1583; &#1571;&#1588;&#1603;&#1575;&#1604; &#1603;&#1579;&#1610;&#1585;&#1577; &#1576;&#1583;&#1608;&#1606; &#1571;&#1610;&#1577; &#1576;&#1610;&#1575;&#1606;&#1575;&#1578; &#1578;&#1581;&#1578;&#1607;&#1575; &#1601;&#1607;&#1609; &#1604;&#1575; &#1578;&#1593;&#1576;&#1585; &#1576;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1605;&#1576;&#1575;&#1588;&#1585; &#1593;&#1605;&#1575; &#1607;&#1608; &#1605;&#1591;&#1604;&#1608;&#1576; &#1608;&#1584;&#1604;&#1603; &#1576;&#1583;&#1569;&#1575;&#1611; &#1605;&#1606; &#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (5) &#1581;&#1578;&#1609; &#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (20)\r\n•	&#1589;&#1601;&#1581;&#1577; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; 5: vocal point &#1589;&#1581;&#1578;&#1607;&#1575; focal point\r\n•	&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (23) &#1601;&#1609; &#1589;&#1601;&#1581;&#1577; 7 &#1576;&#1588;&#1571;&#1606; &#1576;&#1604;&#1608;&#1603;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1575;&#1604;&#1601;&#1610;&#1586;&#1610;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1601;&#1573;&#1606; &#1593;&#1583;&#1583;&#1607;&#1575; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1607;&#1608; \"5\" &#1601;&#1602;&#1591; – &#1601;&#1609; &#1581;&#1610;&#1606; &#1571;&#1606;&#1607; &#1578;&#1605; &#1584;&#1603;&#1585; &#1593;&#1583;&#1583; 7 &#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1601;&#1610;&#1586;&#1610;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1606;&#1589; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1603;&#1578;&#1608;&#1576;\r\n•	&#1589;&#1601;&#1581;&#1577; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; 7: &#1578;&#1589;&#1581;&#1610;&#1581; \"&#1575;&#1604;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; (23) &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; – &#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1576;&#1581; \"&#1575;&#1604;&#1588;&#1603;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (23)\r\n•	&#1603;&#1579;&#1610;&#1585; &#1605;&#1606; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1588;&#1603;&#1575;&#1604; &#1576;&#1610;&#1575;&#1606;&#1575;&#1578;&#1607;&#1575; &#1594;&#1610;&#1585; &#1605;&#1602;&#1585;&#1608;&#1569;&#1577; &#1571;&#1588;&#1603;&#1575;&#1604; &#1605;&#1606; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (25) &#1608;&#1581;&#1578;&#1609; (39)\r\n•	&#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1588;&#1603;&#1575;&#1604; &#1585;&#1602;&#1605; (31) &#1608;(38) &#1605;&#1588;&#1575;&#1585; &#1573;&#1604;&#1610;&#1607;&#1575; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1573;&#1606;&#1580;&#1604;&#1610;&#1586;&#1610;&#1577; Example 4 &#1608; Figure 7 &#1608;&#1607;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1585;&#1602;&#1610;&#1605; &#1604;&#1575; &#1610;&#1605;&#1578; &#1576;&#1589;&#1604;&#1577; &#1604;&#1578;&#1585;&#1602;&#1610;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1588;&#1603;&#1575;&#1604; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1608;&#1585;&#1602;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1610;&#1577;\r\n•	&#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1585;&#1575;&#1580;&#1593; &#1605;&#1593;&#1604;&#1608;&#1605;&#1575;&#1578;&#1607;&#1575; &#1594;&#1610;&#1585; &#1605;&#1603;&#1578;&#1605;&#1604;&#1577; &#1608;&#1594;&#1610;&#1585; &#1603;&#1575;&#1601;&#1610;&#1577; &#1608;&#1576;&#1607;&#1575; &#1571;&#1582;&#1591;&#1575;&#1569; &#1573;&#1605;&#1604;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1608;&#1604;&#1605; &#1610;&#1578;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1573;&#1588;&#1575;&#1585;&#1577; &#1573;&#1604;&#1610;&#1607;&#1575; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1606;&#1589; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1603;&#1578;&#1608;&#1576; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1608;&#1585;&#1602;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1610;&#1577;\r\n'),(122,63,'T','2007-08-14',3,2,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'The paper is based on few literature that the authors have cited and there is no research work presented in the paper.','The papers needs to discuss the research issues and what is the justification for selecting particular teaching methods? This needs to be based on some experimenting with small sample of students to justify the approach'),(124,38,'T','2007-08-20',4,2,'3,4','High','No','No',4,'- Major work required to bring the paper to an aceptable standard\r\n- If there is a merit to use relatively low tech methods, this should be a major part of the rationale of the paper and made explicit\r\n- political and cultural context may be valid, if so should be well formulated.','Paper Review :\r\n\r\nThis paper needs major restructuring and re-editing to constitute an academic research paper, special attention needs to be payed to:\r\n\r\n- Avoid text book style writing, in particular in parts 1 and 2\r\n- Avoid unnecessary detailed explanations of obvious facts e.g.: pp.4, sketching...\r\n- Re-write the rationale, aims and objectives in a more succinct and logical manner\r\n- Reference to existing body of knowledge and existing similar applications is essential to establish a benchmark for the paper\r\n- Sections 3.5 to 3.8 to be summarised in a shorter section part of an intruction or historical context\r\n-Section 3.9 is the important and most relevant to the thrust of the paper ought to be expanded to include methodologies of recording data, accuracy of historical data, authenticity of records...\r\n-Paper to be wholly re-edited for spelling, grammar and format to comply with conference requirements.'),(126,14,'T','2007-08-30',5,2,'1','High','No','Yes',4,'The topic clearly matches the conference theme. Very theoretic but profound knowledge. The author might be a very interesting discussant.','The papers layout is unacceptable.\r\nThe content is too theoretic.\r\nHowever, whenever the author describes practical implementations the paper is unputdownable.   '),(137,64,'T','2007-08-31',2,2,'5','High','No','No',4,'Lack of proper definitions: aesthetic = artificial intelligence? (p 1). \r\n\"Navigating High Dimensional Space\": not clear (p 1; p 6).',NULL),(138,64,'T','2007-08-31',5,3,'2,3','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'One or two figures in part 5 would be fine. References to be completed with recent studies also from Arab countries.',NULL),(140,17,'T','2007-09-02',5,5,'3,4','High','No','Yes',NULL,'again....scope falls under GIS in Planning, rather than GIS in Architecture.','•	It is recommended to plot figures 1 & 4 with the same scale, so the change between the 70s and the present is more apparent.\r\n•	Review the numbering of the figures within the text. For example: on page 2 last paragraph, the text refers to figure 1 instead of figure 6. Again on page 9 first paragraph, the text refers to figure 20 instead of 22. And on page 10 first paragraph, the text refers to figure 24 instead of 26.\r\n•	Double check the text styles. Some paragraphs are in size 11, while others are in size 10.\r\n•	Referring to figures 22 and 23; if the red areas on figure 23 represent the built-up areas, the map of 2005 shows smaller built up area than that of 2010. However, the graph of figure 22 plots more area for 2005 (1050000) than for 2010 (900000). Besides, there are no units given for the area, is it in square meters, square miles, acres, or square kilometers?\r\n•	The labels in figures 24, 25, 26 & 27 are too small to be readable. \r\n•	Consider black/white printing when referring to colors of objects. '),(12,32,'T','2007-08-31',5,4,'2','High','No','Unsure',4,'&#1578;&#1608;&#1580;&#1583; &#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1605;&#1591;&#1608;&#1585;&#1577; &#1605;&#1606; &#1576;&#1575;&#1581;&#1579;&#1610;&#1606; &#1593;&#1585;&#1576; &#1578;&#1602;&#1608;&#1605; &#1576;&#1606;&#1601;&#1587; &#1605;&#1575; &#1610;&#1602;&#1608;&#1605; &#1576;&#1607; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1585;&#1606;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1584;&#1603;&#1608;&#1585; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579; &#1608;&#1584;&#1604;&#1603; &#1605;&#1606; &#1593;&#1575;&#1605; 1996 &#1608;&#1607;&#1606;&#1575;&#1603; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1583;&#1610;&#1583; &#1605;&#1606; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1587;&#1575;&#1578;&#1584;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1589;&#1585;&#1610;&#1610;&#1606; &#1601;&#1609; &#1606;&#1601;&#1587; &#1607;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1582;&#1589;&#1589; &#1608;&#1604;&#1607;&#1605; &#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1605;&#1605;&#1610;&#1586;&#1577; &#1601;&#1609; &#1607;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1580;&#1575;&#1604;','1- &#1578;&#1608;&#1580;&#1583; &#1576;&#1593;&#1590; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1582;&#1591;&#1575;&#1569; &#1575;&#1604;&#1575;&#1605;&#1604;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1610;&#1580;&#1576; &#1578;&#1589;&#1581;&#1610;&#1581;&#1607;&#1575;\r\n2- &#1575;&#1604;&#1583;&#1585;&#1575;&#1587;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1609; &#1578;&#1606;&#1575;&#1608;&#1604;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1570;&#1604;&#1609; &#1604;&#1604;&#1605;&#1582;&#1591;&#1591;&#1575;&#1578; &#1603;&#1604;&#1607;&#1575; &#1571;&#1580;&#1606;&#1576;&#1610;&#1577; &#1576;&#1585;&#1594;&#1605; &#1608;&#1580;&#1608;&#1583; &#1583;&#1585;&#1575;&#1587;&#1575;&#1578; &#1593;&#1585;&#1576;&#1610;&#1577; &#1580;&#1575;&#1583;&#1577; &#1601;&#1609; &#1607;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1580;&#1575;&#1604; &#1604;&#1605; &#1610;&#1604;&#1578;&#1601;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1610;&#1607;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1575;&#1581;&#1579;\r\n3- &#1604;&#1605; &#1610;&#1578;&#1605; &#1573;&#1610;&#1590;&#1575;&#1581; &#1603;&#1610;&#1601;&#1610;&#1577; &#1571;&#1582;&#1584; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1608;&#1580;&#1610;&#1607; &#1601;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1575;&#1593;&#1578;&#1576;&#1575;&#1585; &#1571;&#1579;&#1606;&#1575;&#1569; &#1578;&#1591;&#1608;&#1610;&#1585; &#1593;&#1605;&#1604;&#1610;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1593;&#1604;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1581;&#1575;&#1587;&#1576; &#1604;&#1590;&#1576;&#1591; &#1573;&#1578;&#1580;&#1575;&#1607; &#1575;&#1604;&#1602;&#1576;&#1604;&#1577; &#1608;&#1604;&#1604;&#1578;&#1608;&#1580;&#1610;&#1607; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1606;&#1575;&#1582;&#1609; Orientation)\r\n'),(101,32,'T','2007-08-31',4,4,'4','High','No','Unsure',4,'&#1610;&#1580;&#1576; &#1573;&#1592;&#1607;&#1575;&#1585; &#1575;&#1604;&#1580;&#1607;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1609; &#1575;&#1604;&#1606;&#1592;&#1585;&#1609; &#1608;&#1578;&#1593;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1587;&#1604;&#1608;&#1576; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1578;&#1576;&#1593; &#1604;&#1593;&#1604;&#1575;&#1580; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593;&#1575;&#1578; &#1571;&#1582;&#1585;&#1609; &#1571;&#1605;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1608;&#1580;&#1608;&#1583; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579; &#1601;&#1610;&#1593;&#1578;&#1576;&#1585; &#1571;&#1602;&#1585;&#1576; &#1604;&#1604;&#1578;&#1602;&#1585;&#1610;&#1585; &#1575;&#1604;&#1601;&#1606;&#1609; &#1593;&#1606; &#1605;&#1575; &#1578;&#1605; &#1593;&#1605;&#1604;&#1607; &#1601;&#1609; &#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593; &#1605;&#1581;&#1583;&#1583;.\r\n&#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1591;&#1604;&#1608;&#1576; &#1578;&#1593;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1607;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1587;&#1604;&#1608;&#1576; &#1608;&#1608;&#1590;&#1593; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1587;&#1575;&#1587; &#1575;&#1604;&#1606;&#1592;&#1585;&#1609; &#1604;&#1575;&#1587;&#1578;&#1582;&#1583;&#1575;&#1605;&#1607; &#1601;&#1609; &#1571;&#1609; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593;&#1575;&#1578; &#1571;&#1582;&#1585;&#1609;\r\n&#1610;&#1593;&#1610;&#1576; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579; &#1602;&#1604;&#1577; &#1593;&#1583;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1585;&#1580;&#1593;','1- &#1610;&#1608;&#1580;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1583;&#1610;&#1583; &#1605;&#1606; &#1575;&#1604;&#1571;&#1582;&#1591;&#1575;&#1569; &#1575;&#1604;&#1575;&#1605;&#1604;&#1575;&#1574;&#1610;&#1577; &#1610;&#1580;&#1576; &#1578;&#1583;&#1575;&#1585;&#1603;&#1607;&#1575; &#1608;&#1578;&#1589;&#1581;&#1610;&#1581;&#1607;&#1575;\r\n2- &#1605;&#1578;&#1606; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1604;&#1594;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1585;&#1576;&#1610;&#1577; &#1608;&#1610;&#1578;&#1582;&#1604;&#1604;&#1607; &#1578;&#1593;&#1585;&#1610;&#1601; &#1608;&#1588;&#1585;&#1581; &#1604;&#1604;&#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1576;&#1575;&#1604;&#1604;&#1594;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1575;&#1606;&#1580;&#1604;&#1610;&#1586;&#1610;&#1577; &#1601;&#1604;&#1605;&#1575;&#1584;&#1575; &#1604;&#1605; &#1610;&#1578;&#1605; &#1578;&#1608;&#1581;&#1610;&#1583; &#1604;&#1594;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1567;&#1567;\r\n3- &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579; &#1610;&#1602;&#1578;&#1585;&#1576; &#1605;&#1606; &#1571;&#1606; &#1610;&#1603;&#1608;&#1606; \"&#1578;&#1602;&#1585;&#1610;&#1585; &#1601;&#1606;&#1609;\" &#1593;&#1606; &#1593;&#1605;&#1604;&#1610;&#1577; &#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605; &#1605;&#1588;&#1585;&#1608;&#1593; &#1605;&#1581;&#1583;&#1583; &#1576;&#1593;&#1610;&#1606;&#1607; &#1604;&#1584;&#1575; &#1610;&#1580;&#1576; &#1578;&#1608;&#1590;&#1610;&#1581; &#1575;&#1604;&#1580;&#1607;&#1583; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1581;&#1579;&#1609; &#1608;&#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1604;&#1605;&#1609; &#1576;&#1589;&#1608;&#1585;&#1577; &#1571;&#1603;&#1576;&#1585; &#1605;&#1606; &#1575;&#1587;&#1578;&#1582;&#1583;&#1575;&#1605; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1585;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1605;&#1604;&#1610;&#1577; Technical Report)'),(12,54,'T','2007-08-25',5,3,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,NULL,NULL),(155,60,'T','2007-09-01',3,1,'2,5','High','No','No',4,'This paper need to be restructured, rewritten with focus on the main idea. It is dealing with a very broad spectrum of study, and lacks scientific accuracy.','I suggest that this paper get rewritten with smoother language, less repetition, and to make it more focused and shorter. \r\nThere are many inaccurate information within the text.\r\nThe review is too broad for a conference paper.'),(163,61,'T','2007-09-13',2,2,'5','High','No','Unsure',2,NULL,'This paper is arranged about how Google Earth has been used in a landscape design or the construction field until now.\r\nThe paper does not give an enough amount of new research works.\r\nIt remains only in the contents which inputted the data of an object site into GoogleEarth about actual use.\r\nAn aspect of affairs like a landscape design throat of description of whether to use GoogleEarth is also inadequate.\r\nThe evaluation about those use is not described, either.'),(67,17,'T','2007-09-14',1,1,'5','Low','No','No',NULL,'The paper is either completely out of my scope, or the author managed to write it in a way to make very vague and ambiguous to any reader.\r\n\r\n','1. The presented work is not useful in the form it is now. It needs major alterations to fit the audience of the ASCAAD conference.\r\n2. Lots of terms are used without being clarified; such as \"cyberromanticism\".\r\n3. The concept of the paper is unclear'),(163,44,'T','2007-08-30',4,4,'4','High','No','No',4,NULL,'This is potentially a very neat description of a well defined piece of work: the application of Google Earth to a couple of design projects. The paper falls into the trap (which many of us do) of spending too long on the background and not enough on describing the original aspects of the work. The paper needs to be expanded. The section describing the original work could be enlarged to provide more detail about what was done and how it was done.\r\n\r\nFor example, what is the outcome of the Karlstal project? How has it benefitted its users? I would also like to know more about Travel 2.0 (references?) and how does this relate to the work described here. Similarly, it would be interesting to know more about the applications resulting from Uni 3D. Also, what are the limitations of this approach? How is terrain modelling handled? And, most importantly in landscape application, how is vegetation treated? It may not be possible to answer all of these questions in a conference paper, but it would be reassuring to know that the author(s) have at least thought of these and other questions rather than blindly adopting the Google technology.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, there is no concluding section, drawing together the main points from the paper and the directions that future work could follow. Some ideas about who needs to do what are presented but it would be good to see these fleshed out in greater detail.\r\n\r\nAs in some other papers, the figures are important to understanding the content of the research and in this version they are too small to see any useful detail. Since the paper is not overly long (8 pages) I suggest the author(s) enlarge key images and, if necessary, reduce the number of figures to maintain a suitable length of paper.\r\n\r\nAlthough the paper is generally readable, there are a few sentences where the meaning is not entirely clear or the grammar is incorrect. It needs a thorough proofreading by a native English speaker.\r\n\r\nReference citation in the text is non-standard and needs to be corrected.'),(164,31,'T','2007-09-02',2,2,'3,4','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'While the intial premise of the paper has promise, I don\'t think the author came close to acheiving it: \"The aim of this paper is to reinvent wall in terms of certain deviations in the pattern of relationship with mass with reference to some of the significant works of 20th century. The effectiveness of 3D computer modeling and various animation techniques to represent these analytical ideas together in a non-linear format is another highlight of the presentation.\"\r\n\r\nThe focus on walls to space regarding a historical look while interesting I think is flawed since their is a superfical focus on certain walls as objects on the exteriors of significant modern works as apposed to looking at the structures holistically.  \r\n\r\nThe jump from historical analysis to computer is also not very clear. Better maybe to start from the 3D stuff and show it\'s connections to history so focus can be better.','Your paper focus is an interesting one -- \"The aim of this paper is to reinvent wall in terms of certain deviations in the pattern of relationship with mass with reference to some of the significant works of 20th century.\"\r\n\r\nIt would help to better focus the research on walls, since the connection to computer application is not clear and where you might use this understanding for application needs to be more clearly defined too.\r\n\r\n'),(164,56,'T','2007-08-30',2,2,'5','High','No','No',NULL,'The paper is clearly divided into two parts, the first and longer one discusses concepts of \"wall\" in 20th century architecture, the second one reflects on the possible use of digital media to represent these concepts. The author defines five distinct aspects in which the \"wall\" of 20th century architecture differentiates itself from earlier concepts. This categorization seems rather naïve and even counter-productive. Discussing the examples shown from Doesburg, F.L.Wright and Mies, e.g., on the level of roof-wall-relationships does not add much to our knowledge. I would not demand art-historical depth here, but rather the opposite: to do away with the notions of roof, wall and floor altogether and treat the examples simply as visual data that can be analyzed by computer vision algorithms. The abstract drawings the author has provided would serve as a good input material for such an analysis.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the part of the paper concerning representation lacks any approach in this direction. The digital animations may be interesting to explain the inner logic of each type. But the typology itself could basically be done on paper. \r\n','The paper is clearly divided into two parts, the first and longer one discusses concepts of \"wall\" in 20th century architecture, the second one reflects on the possible use of digital media to represent these concepts. The author defines five distinct aspects in which the \"wall\" of 20th century architecture differentiates itself from earlier concepts. This categorization seems rather naïve and even counter-productive. Discussing the examples shown from Doesburg, F.L.Wright and Mies, e.g., on the level of roof-wall-relationships does not add much to our knowledge. I would not demand art-historical depth here, but rather the opposite: to do away with the notions of roof, wall and floor altogether and treat the examples simply as visual data that can be analyzed by computer vision algorithms. The abstract drawings the author has provided would serve as a good input material for such an analysis.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the part of the paper concerning representation lacks any approach in this direction. The digital animations may be interesting to explain the inner logic of each type. But the typology itself could basically be done on paper. \r\n'),(155,48,'T','2007-09-12',6,2,'2','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'The paper is very interesting, the structure appropriate to such type of paper. I appreciate the use of Arabic language as this will contribute certainly to a wide spread and a better understanding of new technologies in Architecture within the Arab World countries.\r\n','The paper is very interesting, the structure appropriate to such type of paper. I appreciate the use of Arabic language as this will contribute certainly to a wide spread and a better understanding of new technologies in Architecture within the Arab World countries.\r\nI can only reproach the use of Arabic and English within same text, as an alternative way of explaining scientific vocabulary can be adopted, like a glossary at the end of the paper.\r\n'),(20,18,'T','2007-09-02',5,3,'2','High','No','Yes',1,'As said already. It could be interesting if the paper makes clear what the differnces and novel elements are in the framework.','This is an interesting paper. It needs to explain in detail why it is differnt from other research done already in this area and why it contributes to the field. \r\nCurrently is is not really clear what the framework really will acheive new and how it can contribute to a better understanding of urban street scapes.'),(22,18,'T','2007-09-02',2,2,'4','High','No','No',3,'A bit of hot air in a box. It really needs streamline.\r\nformating all wrong.\r\nseams a recycled paper','This is an interesting excurse into theroy and philosophy that relates to recent deveoplment in architectural design. It is crutial to frame the new ways of how design is perceived with exisitng idea and theories.\r\nThe paper is however a bit too much argueing without substantial evidence. some of the references and cross-links are a bit too far fetched and dont really come to a clear message or point. Where is H. pixels then finally?\r\nI think if the paper is more streamlined, less overall and focuses more on one key point (e.g. the pixel) then it can be very good. Yet it needs this amendments.\r\nFormating and styles are all over the places. \r\nthe :Definitions of Critical Sub-systems Ellner, 1981: is not helpful at all and just lists points. there is no context and explation. shoudl be deleted.'),(43,51,'T','2007-09-11',2,2,'4','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'Contention of this paper is abstract and drift of an argument is not clear. For example, it is necessary to define the term with plural meanings as a meaning, and to describe it clearly.\r\n\r\nThere is much abstract statement and judgment of the originality of research is difficult.','Contention of this paper is abstract and drift of an argument is not clear. For example, it is necessary to define the term with plural meanings as a meaning, and to describe it clearly.\r\n'),(56,53,'T','2007-08-27',5,3,'3,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'No doubts, a good respectable work. The paper follows a golden thread and is good for publishing.','The shrinking distance between architectural and medial spaces, the relationship between media and architectural design and the influence of media on the perception of space and design of architectural structures is often discussed in the last decade (or even last decades). \r\nThe described investigation - the relationship between the human form and metaphysical simultaneity as generators of architectural form - is an interesting and important contribution in this field.\r\n\r\nThe paper is well-structured. The paragraphs are well balanced and good to comprehend. The theoretical background, the methodology and the consequence for architecture are well described. The illustrations, the examples and the text are complements each other. Looking forward to an interesting discussion.'),(60,53,'T','2007-08-27',5,2,'4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper is well-structured and good for publishing. Finally, a very interesting topic, which opens up a lot of unanswered questions for discussion.','Good idea, simple looking but necessary and important. The paper describe an interesting approach of the term VR \"...in the realm of architectural photography.\" The current situation and the motivation are well described. The aims of investigation, the concept and the scientific analysis follow a golden thread, but I miss an evaluation. The illustrations, the examples and the text are complements each other.\r\n\r\nThe paper and the presentation are a good starting situation of a further debate.'),(46,49,'T','2007-09-06',4,2,'2,5','High','No','No',4,'See above','The user groups and the topic are more focused now. They are â€œProperty Developers and City Council Urban Designersâ€ and as such a well-defined set. The paperâ€™s purpose is â€œto discuss the development of a robust testing methodology, which will quantify the benefits or otherwise of 3D information display over comparative 2D methodsâ€. The selection of focus groups as the base for the methodology design makes sense in view of the highly specialized audience, although the clients of the â€œurban planning industryâ€ are much more diverse. Therefore, while the topic and beginning of the paper are quite interesting and challenging, the rest of the description leaves the reader with at least two questions: Why, given the small sample size, would the proposed method be the robust testing method announced in the beginning? And what would be the consequences if 2D representations were indeed found by these focus groups to be as effective or even more effective than 3D representations?\r\n\r\n\r\n'),(128,55,'T','2007-08-17',5,3,'1','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'An engaging and interestion paper that shows a methodology of addressing CAD/CAM methods in design. The examples, are not only innovative and challenging but also aesthetically pleasant. ','An engaging and interestion paper that shows a methodology of addressing CAD/CAM methods in design. The examples, are not only innovative and challenging but also aesthetically pleasant. '),(129,55,'T','2007-08-17',1,2,'5','High','No',NULL,4,'Very vague on a subject that is covered quite extensively in recent years. Most of the areas are not only old but also ill-defined by non-researchers.  With the exception of grammars, kinematics, morphing, and keyframing have never been accepted by the computational community as valid approaches to design but rather as superficial formalisms.  In fact, evolutionary algorithms seem to be the most innovative, profound, and relevant design method but it covered only briefly. ','Very vague on a subject that is covered quite extensively in recent years. Most of the areas are not only old but also ill-defined by non-researchers.  With the exception of grammars, kinematics, morphing, and keyframing have never been accepted by the computational community as valid approaches to design but rather as superficial formalisms.  In fact, evolutionary algorithms seem to be the most innovative, profound, and relevant design method but it covered only briefly. '),(135,55,'T','2007-08-17',5,3,'1','High','Unsure','No',4,'A rather long paper but informative.\r\nThe section with projects is quite engaging and may be come inspirational to other researchers.','A rather long paper but informative.\r\nThe section with projects is quite engaging and may be come inspirational to other researchers.'),(21,12,'T','2007-09-14',4,2,'4','High','No','Yes',4,'I feel that this paper requires some revision in terms of clarity prior to publication. It will result in a good contribution, but at present does require some significant proof reading by the authors.','I felt that this abstract is interesting, and that the central idea of tagging is useful and presents an interesting idea. I did tend to feel, though, that the writing on page 1 requires some revision to improve clarity of meaning. This is a very visual idea, and you need to make sure that the reader can understand what you mean, in the absence of images. \r\n\r\nAlso, did you feel that this would be useful as a planning tool, as a design tool, or as something quite different?\r\n\r\nOverall, I feel that the clarity of writing requires a major proof-read, as many of the central and initial ideas appear to be interesting, but are very difficult to follow.'),(12,7,'T','2007-09-03',2,4,'6','Moderate','No','Unsure',4,'-	The concept of generating different design alternatives (the whole plan) based on mathematical equations has many controversial aspects. Researchers tend to computationally facilitate certain tasks of the design process, not the whole process.\r\n-	Defining the typology relationships of the mosque components in table 3 based on a subjective point of view (the researcher’s) returns the design process to its main point, the immaterial issues should be within the designer role (computer can not replace this role). The research must clear this point before going further on creating any design alternative.\r\n-	In design alternatives, what is the space between spaces number 17 and number 3 in figure 2? In figure 3, there are many questions regarding the functional appropriateness of these alternatives. \r\n-	The research will be more efficiency if it only concentrates on measuring the functionality of a number of existing mosques, without maintaining the possibility of introducing design alternatives.\r\n','-	The concept of generating different design alternatives (the whole plan) based on mathematical equations has many controversial aspects. Researchers tend to computationally facilitate certain tasks of the design process, not the whole process.\r\n-	Defining the typology relationships of the mosque components in table 3 based on a subjective point of view (the researcher’s) returns the design process to its main point, the immaterial issues should be within the designer role (computer can not replace this role). The research must clear this point before going further on creating any design alternative.\r\n-	In design alternatives, what is the space between spaces number 17 and number 3 in figure 2? In figure 3, there are many questions regarding the functional appropriateness of these alternatives. \r\n-	The research will be more efficiency if it only concentrates on measuring the functionality of a number of existing mosques, without maintaining the possibility of introducing design alternatives.\r\n'),(48,3,'T','2007-09-05',4,2,'2,3','Moderate','No','Yes',4,NULL,'The paper is discussing an important issue about the discontinuity of urban pattern of Qasba city in Algeria. The research presented covers wide theories such as Space Syntax and demonstrated in-depth application of the theory on a practical case study. \r\nMy main concern is with the number of missing references that were mentioned in the body of the paper and do not appear in the references section. There is also confusion in Figures 18 to 21 where I do not see the difference between the axial maps on the right and left side. This is a very important figure and the papers will be printed in black and white. Can the author show the difference by altering the line weights of these maps instead of using the coloring convention?\r\n'),(19,24,'T','2007-09-06',2,NULL,'5','Moderate',NULL,NULL,NULL,'I found this submission very confusing and unclear at a fundamental level.  There is lots of jargon and diagrams, and it needs better structure in terms of framing the overall context. I feel it needs a lot of work to be convincing. DesignMap certainly tries to claim a lot in terms of the contribution it is making but I feel it is flawed in many respects. The conclusion of this paper where it is claimed that this approach provides the foundations for a seamless and continuous designing environment for architects and urban planners through its innovative modeling system, integrated designing framework and novel design library is a tall claim to make.  It is pitched very high but fails to make the argument for such a system. A computing scientist may find this type of project interesting from a theoretical point of view in terms programming, networking, sharing data etc but I still question this as a working practical tool.','The justification for a DesignMap described is not particularly clear and is confusing to read. This proposal would benefit greatly by describing the need, benefits and outputs resulting from such activity.  The outcomes from this research are mentioned but again are not made clear. Some statements on the basic objectives of this research would help the reader understand what were the key questions that were being addressed?  For example how can a computational tool also be a design network?  This proposal needs to communicate the importance of bringing together architects and urban planners, what are the shared needs and interests of these two groups and how and why it is important that they should work together online?  Why is this digital resource important for these two groups and potentially others? Having established such a resource what are the key outputs?'),(24,31,'T','2007-09-02',5,3,'1','Moderate','Yes','Yes',1,'Good paper! Well organized and clear.','Great paper! Well organized and clear.'),(32,40,'T','2007-09-01',4,4,'4,5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'I think this paper would be significantly better if the detail on wireless systems were trimmed and the focus perhaps widened a little to discuss e.g. what kind of data would need to be included, how it should be harvested and maintained, etc.\r\n\r\n','Interesting idea.  How realistic is the proposed scenario?  -- The client presumably has a lot of things other than the specification of the building to consider if thinking of setting up in a new city.  It would be good if the building info could be integrated with some of these other urban issues?\r\n\r\nThere is a huge amount of technical detail in this paper that isn\'t really necessary -- we can probably get a sufficient grasp of the issues without the complete details of the various wireless systems, which are in any case fairly well known. \r\n\r\nHave any other approaches been considered?  -- E.g. how about matching photos of the building with an image database, as seems to be emerging as a technique for shopping -- see  http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2156274/camera-phone-ids-products --  this might work quite well here? (At least where you don\'t have a lot of buildings that all look more or less the same.)\r\n\r\nMuch of the English in this paper is rather unnatural, compared with native English; but it\'s always understandable, so perhaps this is not important.\r\n\r\n'),(135,3,'T','2007-09-13',4,1,'5','High','No','No',4,'readers can find many papers about and even resources of visual illustration about form generation. The paper does not explain useful information relating to the  actual techniques and steps for creating these 3D forms. It is very theoretical!','This is very long paper and needs to be reduced. The author needs to ‘very briefly’ introduce the underlying techniques in form generation and evolution that relates directly with the study. The paper is of good quality and illustrates series of example project. However, the reader will be very interested if the study elaborates in-depth about 2-3 projects selected by the author. Such type of illustration about evolutionary form generation can be found anywhere but what makes this paper of real value is describing the actual approach, mechanism, show some of the computation algorithms affecting the form change behavior, etc.'),(155,3,'T','2007-09-13',4,1,'3','Low','No','Yes',4,NULL,'The paper topic is covering wide literature and techniques applied in digital design technologies. The paper is in the style of survey of up to date revolution theories in using digital media in architecture. However, the author is not providing a real research problem - it is just like a review. The language is written clear in Arabic and the author shows good command in covering the technical terminologies associated with this topic.'),(138,15,'F',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL),(149,49,'T','2007-09-06',4,5,'1,2,3','High','No','Yes',2,'see above','This is an interesting collection of cases describing the use of Google Earth and KML. The research question is not really defined, but the authors describe the applications in a clear and attractive way. The change of landscapes over time, the use of level of Detail and dynamic views are well illustrated. In this case, the presentation, the images and animations are crucial to distinguish and experience the work. As the paper does not discuss technical details, this may be a weakness of the approach: the reader would like to know more about the differences in content and impact between the cases described here and those described in earlier dynamic modelling work. And the reader would still need to know more about the underlying research question.'),(11,6,'T','2007-09-15',4,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'The paper has nothing new but the project that they worked on.\r\nI am tempted to accept the paper because it kinds of gives an example of heritage conservation with digital tools.\r\n\r\n','The research contained in this paper is not up-to-date in particular, however, the project discussed is valuable in terms of its documentation and for the use of VR as a tool to conserve heritage. Perhaps a section emphasising this aspect will add tot he paper.'),(11,7,'T','2007-09-09',2,4,'6','Moderate','No',NULL,4,'-	Research contribution is not enough.\r\n-	The research needs language revision.','-	Research contribution is not enough.\r\n-	The research needs language revision.'),(18,3,'T','2007-09-08',4,2,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,NULL,'The paper tends to focus more on describing the approach textually which is dangerous in such type of studies. Although the 3D forms generated as an output of the ‘KISS Modeling’ approach are interesting, as a reader I was unable to understand the underlying method of this approach. This is due to the following reasons:\r\n- I totally disagree that a ‘Keep it Simple, Stupid’ is a rule used for scientific research or even appropriate language! I also could not figure out what is the simplicity in keeping it stupid!!!\r\n- Section (4) reviewing literature can tremendously be reduced to quarter its amount and in fact the author can focus more on the actual method in form-finding that directly relates to the study. This will give the author some extra space in this section to ad illustrations to describe the concepts in simple way.\r\n- What does KISS stands for?\r\n- Figure 1 is not clear at all. T either needs to be explained very well in the text or be detailed further with assisting figures.\r\n- Sections (5.2.1) and (5.3) are not clear because they need to be supported with lots of figures. After all, this type of paper is describing practical development instead of theories. \r\n- In section (5.3): How come the ‘Delete’ button is a powerful function! The ‘Delete’ button is just a ‘Delete’ button.\r\n- Section (6) is not clear. When it was mentioned Figures 1,2, and 3 I could not find them next to the text.\r\n- It is very important to elaborate on Figure 2. Does each group of images show a transformation of an original object through stages? How? What kind of transformations (e.g. skew, twist, rotate, offset, etc.) applied on the input shape that result to the final mass?\r\n\r\nPlease explain your ideas simply. In fact the paper will improve more if more visual illustrations are provided.\r\n'),(30,3,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'2,4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,NULL,'This is a good paper and the problem is well defined. It was interesting to see the results of mapping water pollution information in GIS in a practical problem in the developing countries. Please make sure to visually illustrate sources of pollutions in Figure 2 (other figures too) in black and white may be using different arrow styles or shaded color. Remember that the conference book will be published in black & white. Finally the flow chart in Figure 4 is hard to read, can you make the font clearer'),(42,7,'T','2007-09-09',4,4,'6','High','No','Yes',4,'-	Architecture design has been related to 3D, and nowadays 4D is added. So, why is it important to use images (2D) in designing? This question should be discussed in the research.\r\n-	The research displays a method of 3D representation through 2D images, not a method of designing.','-	Architecture design has been related to 3D, and nowadays 4D is added. So, why is it important to use images (2D) in designing? This question should be discussed in the research.\r\n-	The research displays a method of 3D representation through 2D images, not a method of designing.'),(45,6,'T','2007-09-12',5,3,'4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper is appropriate as it is for publication. There are several comments and ways it can be improved, but they are not essential.\r\n\r\n','Many thanks for the great paper. While the comments are extensive, I would like to reiterate that the paper is appropriate for publication and that these comments are merely to produce an even stronger paper.\r\n\r\nWhen accepted a technical demo or a video must be presented in the conference.\r\n\r\nReferring to page 11: While technical documentation is relevant to this paper, still it is not important to have details unless they are enough to construct a similar experiment. I strongly suggest to replace the section with a general comparison between the project and similar installations and the difference in application.\r\n\r\nMoreover, the attention should be drawn to the reported experience of subjects who interacted with this installation as it is a very interesting and might give an insight into their experience.\r\n\r\nThere were several medical applications suggested as way of utilising this installation, and I would suggest that the author support these with references as it is one aspect that requires more of an empirical study than artistic one.\r\n'),(45,21,'T','2007-09-07',4,2,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The idea of the paper is a new one, and it is opening new perspectives in the urban design field.\r\n\r\nThe methodology is not well defined, and it needs more literatures feedbacks.\r\n\r\nThe illustrations should be more clarified.\r\n\r\nThe paper is less focused on architectural aspects. It is more focused on analysing the children behaviour during playing.\r\n\r\nThe paper needs more work in the conclusions and the solutions that should be implemented, especially from architectural perspective. \r\n','The idea of the paper is a new one, and it is opening new perspectives in the urban design field.\r\n\r\nThe methodology is not well defined, and it needs more literatures feedbacks.\r\n\r\nThe illustrations should be more clarified.\r\n\r\nThe paper should be focused more on architectural aspects.'),(116,38,'T','2007-09-07',5,2,'1','Moderate','Yes','Yes',4,'- Very good paper, demonstrates effectively how new ITC technologies may be used for socio-cultured ends\r\n- Well discussed, well written and well referenced with good theoretical underpinnings\r\n\r\n- Recommned Accept.','- Paper well written, the occasional typo to be attended to\r\n- Any user feedback, even from pilot tests, on the VE will be tremendously valuable to the quality of the paper.'),(131,3,'T','2007-09-06',4,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,NULL,'Very interesting paper showing results of semi-structured survey about BIM in AEC. I enjoyed the feedback presented from groups and I think most of the comments critically the pros and cons about the BIM implementation. The paper will generate an interesting debate in ACSAAD conference.\r\nOne important remark, the content of the paper doe not match the title. I was expecting to read more about how your survey found answers to critical issues such as: how BIM provides evaluation of the building to comply with Part ‘L’ regulations? Have you explored SBEM developed by BRE that is currently being used by architectural firms in UK?\r\n\r\nGeneral comments:\r\n- I think the author is confusing BIM that stands for Building Information Modeling with Building Integrated Modeling. The known term of BIM is Building Information Modeling.\r\n- Section 1, paragraph 1: replace ‘… mediums…’ with the plural ‘media’..!!\r\n- Section 1, paragraph 1: wasn’t the term BIM coined by Graphisoft ArchiCAD!! Please check or provide a useful reference to that. Let’s not confuse readers!!\r\n- If possible include Figure two within the body of the paper after mentioning it in the text.\r\n'),(131,60,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'2,4','High','Yes','Yes',4,'well structured research with clear methodology.\r\na good paper overall.','very good discussion.'),(139,7,'T','2007-09-09',1,2,'6','Moderate','No','Yes',4,NULL,NULL),(45,3,'T','2007-09-08',4,2,'3','Low','No','Yes',4,'I am not familiar with the theories underlying this topic but the ideas flow thru the paper is organized. I assume the approach described for designing digital playground in Virtual Environment would match the conference theme.','please summarize the literature review in Section (2) so that it only focuses on the methods directly related to the developed system. If space allows then enlarge the figures and explain more in the text, especially Figure 4.'),(145,38,'T','2007-09-07',4,NULL,'3','High','No','Yes',4,'- Key references slightly out of date, e.g.: all section 3 based on one 1986 source\r\n- Basic approach and data collected / simulation results aceoptable for such a paper but need to be presented with much better clarity and rigour\r\n- Analysis section is essential.\r\n\r\n-Recommend accept subject to completion and changes as advised.','- The paper needs re-editing:\r\n        = Spelling and some grammar\r\n        = Fonts, margins...stick to editing guide\r\n        = Figures to be better re0organised, titles added \r\n          plus explanatory annotation added for clarity\r\n- 2 sestion / paragraphs need to be added to give the paper a better structural integrity\r\n        1- ECOTECT: intruction + main characteristic + \r\n           climatic data used + any shortcomings? \r\n        2- Analysis / commentary of results of meusurements\r\n- Measurement results on the one hand and simulation results on the othe hand need to be very explicit, compared... to support conclusions\r\n-Conclusion need re-writing to reflect the results better.'),(166,6,'T','2007-09-12',1,2,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'This paper has no merit at all. I strongly recommend to reject.\r\n\r\n','The paper tends to answer general questions with general answers. \r\nThe illustrations did not reflect content.\r\nThe over structure has a basic flaw. Papers are generally expected to have basic sections like the general question, the literature review, the experimentation or critique, the discussion and finally conclusion. However, the author in this occasion missed many of these sections.\r\n\r\nIf accepted then it should be rewritten very specifically in terms of the sections mentioned above. and should concentrate on the technical aspects of the paper.\r\n\r\nplease adhere to the template of the conference, and do not change margins or font size.\r\n'),(34,3,'T','2007-09-08',2,1,'5','High','No','Yes',3,'I am very familiar with 4D planning and visualization and in brief this paper has covered a wide literature but still lacks to produce a new output to extend 4D technologies. Most of 4D tools in market or in research covers all the problems raised in this study.','4D technology is a current fact and challenging visualization medium for project planning.  It will be very important for such type of studies to extend 4D research in further directions. The authors cover tremendously a great body of literature necessary for the study. However, there are some questions this research & case study did not answer clearly, they are summarized below:\r\n- How was the critical activities in the schedule affected the study in the decision to develop the 4D model?\r\n- The author mentions in Section (2.1) 3D CAD models lack necessary detail information like temporary work. The reader will expect to see such information being modeled in the current case study to extend on previous 4D research. None of the Figures presented actually illustrates this implementation.\r\n- It is understood that the purpose of 4D development in this work should help planners in validating complex activity sequences (section 5). This is a major challenge indeed. It will be argued that for a simple rectangular shape building, sequencing ground floor slab before the upper floor slabs is a simple activity. I can guess (and not being critical) that the case study should highlight more real conflicts between complex activities. For example, previous 4D researchers highlighted sever conflicts as result of M&E work package and other activities. It is, as the author mentioned, common practice to construct building from the ground up to the roof!\r\n- Section (8.1). What was the extra level of detail developed for PCC slab work package? The illustration figures do not seem to show such level of detail. This is a challenging 4D model production technique and it will be very interesting if more visual illustration is provided to show the level of detail in the project schedule and product model. The explanation is too general be or real benefit to the reader.\r\n- Section (10): that current 4D tools like Common Point, Graphisoft 5D Constructor, NavisWorks Time Liner, etc. are being used by contractors and have support to all these features.\r\nGenera notes on language and clarity of paper writing:\r\n- Section (2.2) paragraph 1: use ‘… his/her…’ instead of ‘… a planner uses its own…’.\r\n- Section (11, i) tackles a valid problem in current industry that is the lack of technical skills future planners. Please replace ‘… 4D planning is a profession..’ with ‘… 4D planners’.\r\n- The second conflict visualization and resolution mentioned in Section (8.2) is not clear. It is perhaps easier if the author provides additional illustration showing the detailed level 4D model showing the foundation work package and the sub-assembling of its components. Has this been reflected in the construction schedule too?\r\n'),(34,58,'T','2007-09-08',2,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'The argument is generic and the case studies are not appropriately described, so I place this paper as Probable Reject.','4D modeling as planning tool will become one of the convenient tools for construction and project management as the author explains. The discourse is, however, very generic and contains no new perspective how the 4D model will benefit the AEC industry. Particularly the model used for the case study is quite simple and even without 4D program CM can identify the optimum solutions. In addition, because the case studies do not describe how the 4D model optimized the sequences, the effect of the 4D is uncertain. In the real world, the building information model (BIM) draws a lot of attention and if the 4D model were integrated w/ the BIM it may be a potential tool to streamline the programming process.'),(21,6,'T','2007-09-14',1,3,'4','High','No','No',4,'The English in the paper is so poor that you can not understand anything at all.\r\n\r\nI would strongly suggest to reject, unless it is rewritten in English.\r\n','I am sure that the paper is a great one in its original language. The structure and ideas are clearly well composed and structured. However, the English language in the paper seems to be a literal translation from the original language and this makes the paper incomprehensible. In order to be accepted, it needs to be rewritten in English from scratch.'),(21,7,'T','2007-09-09',4,4,'6','High','No','Yes',4,'-	Using of tag to practice the microscopic description through networking might be enough as a research contribution. But, there are other parts used without any need to the extent that they weaken the research (for example, why discussing “place making in conventional perspectives” as long as the research concentrates on the virtual).\r\n-	There are some parts (some terms illustrated) should be deleted or reduced in the theoretical background. On the other side, the implementation parts of: the introduced system, and the Chinese Garden are too small (beside only one case is demonstrated).\r\n-	A heading must followed by some writings for illustration and introduction to the following heading (in many parts, a heading is followed by another heading).\r\n-	Resolution of some figures is not clear enough.','-	Using of tag to practice the microscopic description through networking might be enough as a research contribution. But, there are other parts used without any need to the extent that they weaken the research (for example, why discussing “place making in conventional perspectives” as long as the research concentrates on the virtual).\r\n-	There are some parts (some terms illustrated) should be deleted or reduced in the theoretical background. On the other side, the implementation parts of: the introduced system, and the Chinese Garden are too small (beside only one case is demonstrated).\r\n-	A heading must followed by some writings for illustration and introduction to the following heading (in many parts, a heading is followed by another heading).\r\n-	Resolution of some figures is not clear enough.'),(93,60,'T','2007-09-08',3,1,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'I do not agree with many broad assumptions made in this paper. some of them are not true from a professional and scientific stand point.\r\ntalking about particular applications and not categories.\r\nthere is no new information.\r\nfigures do not help the text.\r\nreferences not used in context to support arguments.\r\nthe paper is not well structured, I couldn\'t understand the main goal. The author didn\'t clarify if he had first hand his experience teaching design or CAD, however, there are strikingly bold statements regarding some odd teaching practice.','I do not agree with many broad assumptions made in this paper. some of them are not true from a professional and scientific stand point.\r\ntalking about particular applications and not categories.\r\nthere is no new information.\r\nfigures do not help the text.\r\nreferences not used in context to support arguments.\r\nthe paper is not well structured, I couldn\'t understand the main goal. The author didn\'t clarify if he had first hand his experience teaching design or CAD, however, there are strikingly bold statements regarding some odd teaching practice.'),(61,31,'T','2007-09-02',4,1,'1,2','Low','Unsure','Yes',4,'This topic has strong potential. It would be great to see some applications developed from the theory behind it.\r\n','This topic has strong potential. It would be great to see some applications developed from the theory behind it.\r\n'),(72,39,'T','2007-09-03',4,3,'4','High','No','Yes',2,NULL,'The conclusion did not fully address the learning environment aspect of the work.  That should be included.'),(36,48,'T','2007-09-12',6,3,'2','Moderate','Unsure','No',4,'The paper is well written, and is the best I read for ASCAAD07, can be selected for the award, but because of the length, I don\'t think it will be the case.','Very clear and interesting paper. Should be accepted.'),(98,21,'T','2007-09-02',5,3,'3,4','High','No','Yes',4,'The research methodology is clear.\r\n\r\nThe research introduces new issues in designing modelling subject.\r\n\r\nThere should be some relations to other literatures.\r\n\r\nThe legend in the figures must be readable.\r\n','There should be some relations to other literatures.\r\n\r\nThe legend in the figures must be readable.\r\n'),(99,21,'T','2007-09-02',4,3,'3','High','No','Yes',4,'The research methodology is clear, and the research problem is well defined.\r\n\r\nThere should be more work in the results and the conclusions. \r\n\r\nThere should be some connections with other related literatures, because there is too shortage of using references that could support the paper’s main idea.\r\n','There should be more work in the results and the conclusions. \r\n\r\nThere should be some connections with other related literatures, because there is too shortage of using references that could support the paper’s main idea.\r\n\r\n'),(151,23,'T','2007-09-04',5,3,'2','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'Accept\r\n\r\nContent, presentation, and writing meet professional norms; improvements may be advisable but generally acceptable.','Generally well constructed paper.\r\n\r\nExpand on conclusions related to \"using computers in new ways rather than mimicking earlier technologies\" as this aspect offers most promise from the paper to position CADD and Digital Media as proposing a \"methodology\" for thinking and working \r\n\r\nExpand description of pedagogy of courses and their educational methods.'),(125,19,'T','2007-08-31',5,1,'5','High','No','Yes',NULL,'The abstract shows that the area of computer application is very limited.\r\n\r\nIt is not normal when a research paper regarding Virtual reality and CAD does not include any figure at all.\r\n ','The conference is about computer aided design. So the area of simulation and modelling employing the computer technology would be appreciated.\r\nThis would be shown clear in the final paper.\r\n\r\nIt is not normal when a research paper regarding Virtual reality and CAD does not include any figure at all.\r\n\r\nThe paper is not in the final conference format as well as the references.\r\n\r\nReferences would be reviewed because there is a repitition in some of them like (e.g. NICHOLLS, R.J. AND M. MIMURA, 1998. Regional Issues Raised By Sea-Level Rise And Their Policy Implications. In: Climate Change, 11, 5-18.) is ritten two times\r\ne.g. ZELZENIK, R., HENDRON, K. AND HUGHES, J: 1996. SKETCH: An Interface For Sketching 3D Scenes In: Computer Graphics Annual Conference, ACM. is not included in the text at all.\r\nReferences , specially journals, are not written in a consistant format (e.g. for articles pages sometimes 319-328, and sometimes pp. 213-234, or Pp. 123-134). For author name sometimes written (Last, First), and sometimes (first name and last name. '),(56,28,'T','2007-09-03',5,3,'2,4','High','No','No',4,'I will send my mark up comments in a word doc.\r\nPaper is heading in the right direction. I think it needs more examples and ilustrations with captions to make explicit the theoretical ideas discussed.',NULL),(57,28,'T','2007-09-03',5,3,'2,4','High','Unsure','Yes',NULL,NULL,'A well written paper that positions the work well and describes technical issues very clearly. \r\n\r\nOnly the last paragraph needs some rephrasing and typos corrected.'),(74,28,'T','2007-09-03',5,4,'3','High','No','No',4,'I will send my comments in a word doc.\r\nI feel more of the claims need to be elaborated with examples and figures. The paper is too short to accomplish this \"proof\" or demomstration.','I feel more of the claims need to be elaborated with examples and figures. The paper is too short to accomplish this \"proof\" or demomstration.'),(149,46,'T','2007-09-04',4,4,'2','High','No','Yes',4,'Much of what is stated in the paper is rather obvious, i.e. there aren\'t any particularly novel insights offered by the author(s). The concluding chapter is very weak. OTOH, this could be an interesting presentation at the conference.\r\n\r\nAs a side note, the paper wasn\'t anonymous. I don\'t know the identity of the author, but could easily see that the institution is the University of Kaiserslautern.','The structure of the paper is clear and the contents are fairly well presented; however, much of what is stated in the paper is rather obvious, i.e. there aren\'t any particularly novel insights offered by the author(s). The concluding chapter is very weak and may require additional effort to make it acceptable. There are numerous writing errors that shouldn\'t be difficult to fix.'),(156,46,'T','2007-09-04',4,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'It seems the author was \"blinded\" by the technological possibilities without offering any behavioral or psychological justification for the premises underlying the work. As a consequence, the presentation could end up being overly technical.','This reviewer still needs to be convinced that all that proposed automation in the office environments is desirable, let alone necessary. Scant evidence for the underlying premises is provided; the three references that appear at the end are not mentioned in the paper. On the positive side, the paper is fairly well written, with a clear structure. The system\'s features and implementation are clearly presented.'),(160,46,'T','2007-09-04',5,4,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'This should be a very interesting presentation.','The paper is well written and with a clear structure. Its main shortcoming is a lack of references to related research work in wind-optimized building forms done, for example, at the techical universities in Delft and Eindhoven. Even the works listed at the end are not referenced in the text.'),(31,29,'T','2007-09-01',4,4,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The paper is not as badly flawed, major effort is necessary to be acceptable, some justification for the objective would help and the mentioned corrections are necessary as well. Even though, the content is OK and the approach would be useful. ','1. The stated objective is to apply mapping technique that helps in analyzing digital photos that shows light polluted areas: \r\n   a. The research introduced that technique as a “visual tool”, it would be helpful to mention why the digital photographs are not enough to give an idea regarding the light pollution intensity? \r\n   b. And why the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) is better than other “interpolation models” that create continuous surface mapping?\r\n\r\n2. In section 3.1.2, the photometric survey procedure needed to be explained clearly by having diagrams that show how and where the reading points were taken vertically.\r\n\r\n3. Also how those readings were associated with the digital images? On a grid or through a vertical section on one line? Also, did the researcher get any benefits out of those readings or relied only on the digital image pixels’ illumination?\r\n\r\n4. A brief introduction to the “Surface approximation of point data using different interpolation techniques” in the GIS would be useful to the reader and helps to understand the validity of the process. \r\n\r\n5. Some work is needed in figures and charts; the flow chart in Figure 3 is not readable, multiple images in one figures need to have titles (a, b, c).\r\n\r\n6. Graphs are not informative and need significant corrections:\r\n\r\n   a. The “x” axis has no units so the distance between columns is not relevant if there are no units or legend. \r\n   b. Two graphs have same title (graph 1 in page 10) \r\n   c. The legend has numbers that define the pollution columns, but no clue what those numbers are standing for? Values? Distances? Areas? Intensity? \r\n   d. Graph 4 (which comes before graph 3 !) has on Y axis numbers indicated as “value”; what value? And the X axis has neither value nor a legend.\r\n\r\n7. English need some revisions regarding spelling, grammar, and style. \r\n'),(119,29,'T','2007-08-31',1,2,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'1. The research is far from the conference topic of interest.\r\n\r\n2. What is stated in the abstract is not what is in the paper content with regard to the computer application that would assess the evaluation method\r\n\r\n3. There is no hypothesis to be tested regarding the ratios founded in the field study\r\n\r\n4. No conclusion is derived out of the findings except categorizing the cases in the study into two groups !!\r\n','1. Content inappropriate to the conference and far from the conference topic of interest. \r\n\r\n2. Even though it is mentioned in the abstract that, an evaluation method will be taken in consideration to establish the geometric relationships and suggested a framework to evaluate such rules by the computer; the research did not involve the computer application in anyway regarding the subject. Even no framework is proposed to evaluate such results based on a computer application. \r\n\r\n3. In addition to this, the findings (the ratios) listed in the table are categorized in two groups accordingly; but no further conclusion is suggested to assess any hypothesis could be behind such ratios, or even to relate the results to any known proportioning system, or suggesting a new one based on a research hypothesis. \r\n'),(41,58,'T','2007-09-01',4,2,'2','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'As the author explains that he/she did not have time to prepare for the images, we should re-review the paper with images for the final decision. Or the committee may decide whether ask the author to resubmit the paper or reject it because of over due.  The content is interesting but it is half-done as a research paper as stated above. Total word count is about 3,500 and it should fall into research in progress category. Therefore, I place this paper as conditional.','This is an interesting research, but some of the discussions involve irrelevant issues and aspects. While the author excuses that he/she did not have time to include images, this paper itself seems to be incomplete and the research is unsolved. For instance, although the de-con. has impacted architecture theoretically and led to re-composition of architectural form as the author discusses, it had little to do with surface so more argument is needed to discuss surface from the decon. In addition, there is a logical gap between Baudrillard and architectural surface. As a whole, compared to the first half that displays the author’s supporting ideas based on the intensive research on the theory, his/her own discourse in the latter half is a kind of generic. It is still a showcase of theories of others and the author’s own view and contribution are not clarified. \r\nFor detail, learning form the manufacturing industry the Voxel-based model is becoming commonplace in architectural discipline with recent improved computer power (it is still a kind of expensive though), so the author might not exclude it in a single line. Footnote does not conform to the required paper format (essentially prohibited) and some typos are found; e.g. modeling and modelling coexist, so correct them carefully\r\n'),(43,58,'T','2007-08-29',2,1,'4','Moderate','No','No',4,'While the author explains that this is a research in progress, the contents are not satisfactory and incomplete as noted above. Total words are about 1,600, so the author can have next chance by reinforcing his/her discourse. Burning Man example displays only a limited part of phenomena of what digital communication changes and as the author notes it is bizarre ritual subculture and very subjective. It might not be suitable for a research paper. There is a huge gap between the first abstract and the full paper. Therefore, I place this paper as Probable Reject.','The theme of this paper “Digital Sublime” is quite intriguing and the reemergence and maybe reinterpretation of the term bricolage (we have used and discussed this term many times in the recent past) in the digital era can initiate an interesting discourse. This paper, however, seems to be half-done and the discussion is unsatisfactory. In addition, while the author explains that this paper is composed of the three parte of survey, examples, and conclusions, the causality is less convincing. The survey part develops discourse on the sublime quoting precursors, but it is still a patchwork of the theories and may need to be restructured. In the example part, while the author mentioned in the abstract that he/she will deal with architecture, landscape, and spatiality, the discussion on these aspects is quite weak. Finally, nothing is discussed that how GA (genetic algorithm) creates new path for the sublime.'),(143,63,'T','2007-08-15',2,1,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'The english of the paper is not good and the title of the paper is not clear and misleading. The paper lacks focus and figures are not clear (figures 2,3 and 4). The content of the paper has no focus, references are not cited and there is no proper conclusion. There is no indication of the research issues and methodologies.','The title of the paper is not clear and misleading. The paper lacks in depth anlysis and figures are not clear (figures 2,3 and 4). The content of the paper has no focus, references are not cited and there is no proper conclusion. There is no indication of the research issues and methodologies.'),(64,15,'F',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL),(93,39,'T','2007-09-03',3,4,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'Not much new information, opinion mostly, not referenced to any studies or other like papers, not sure what it would added to the current discussion on the direction of CAAD.',NULL),(76,49,'T','2007-09-06',3,1,'4,5','High','No','No',4,'see above','The abstract contains a clear statement: â€œThis research paper focuses on the use of virtual technology in science learning, it is the designing of a centre where, the space unfolds the science theories in three dimensional worlds, in which the learner experiments with the molecular study, moves to the inner most of the human body, explores the layers of earth and other planets.â€ After this, the paper develops as a poetic structure of ideas and proposals for a virtual science environment. In the following pages, the document turns into a collage of descriptions of precedents - such as: â€œfrom Babylon right up to the baroqueâ€, all the way to Gaudi and Gehryâ€™s structures and excursions into the history of CAD. The Science Center and the Virtual Archi-Sculpture seem to form the core of the paper. Then follows a fascinating collection of possible learning contents and learning environments. The authors claim that â€œThe research suggests that such immersive, multisensory experiences enhance studentsâ€™ abilities to conceptualize and integrate complex, abstract scientific ideasâ€, but the source remains unclear. In summary, an interesting paper that leaves much space for interpretation.\r\n\r\n\r\n'),(148,54,'T','2007-08-30',6,3,'4','High','Yes','Unsure',2,NULL,NULL),(75,56,'T','2007-08-29',5,2,'4','High','Unsure','Yes',2,'The paper is quite theoretical, but the experiment described is straight-forward and could be implemented. \r\n\r\n--- abstract comments ---\r\nThe bus-stop experiment is a good testcase for some of the authors want to investigate, i.e. embodiment, spatiality,  consciousness and intentionality. As it seems that the \"experiment\" is just an concept at the moment, the authors should expand the idea to other application secenatios for the full paper.','The notion that \"space *is* a narrative device\" seems overstretched to me (p2). It may be used as such a device, but why defining it essentially as narrative? You continue that \"its aim is to provide ... a platform\". Does space \"aim\" at anything? In which sense?\r\n\r\n\r\n--- abstract comments ---\r\nThe bus-stop experiment is a good testcase for some of the authors want to investigate, i.e. embodiment, spatiality,  consciousness and intentionality. As it seems that the \"experiment\" is just an concept at the moment, I would suggest to expand the idea to other application secenatios for the full paper (unless you have actually realized the concept until then).'),(76,56,'T','2007-08-29',1,2,'5','High','No','Unsure',NULL,'The paper seems to be not more than an addition of catchworks and well known examples of VR application.\r\n---\r\nThe abstract is well written and refers to essential aspects and perspectives of VR, but it lacks information on what research has actually been carried out. The term \"scultpuring\" used in the title is not explained or even mentioned any further in the abstract itself. The combination of catchwords in the end makes me wonder if this is more than just a proposal of waht could be done, but not a report on actual research work.','Not much improvement to the abstract. Sculpturing is now mentioned, but it remains unclear throughout the paper, what it specifically is about in the context of VR. No question, it is important to design VR space, in learning environments and elsewhere. But the paper lacks any concrete message, e.g. a discussion of how to distinguish good from bad design. \r\n--\r\nThe abstract is well written and refers to essential aspects and perspectives of VR, but it lacks information on what research haas actually been carried out. Please make clear if this is a concept or the result of a concrete experiment. The term \"scultpuring\" used in the title is not explained or even mentioned any further in the abstract itself.'),(126,3,'T','2007-09-12',3,1,'5','Low','No','Yes',4,NULL,'The paper tend to present theories related with virtual architecture. A balanced critique about digital architecture and how it triggers creativity in the new design process is also presented.\r\n\r\nGeneral Notes:\r\n- The abstract needs to be rewritten in the style of an abstract defining a problem or argument, method of investigation, etc.\r\n- Make sure to format the paper according with ASCAAD paper template and guide. Especially the formatting of all text paragraphs and references.\r\n'),(129,3,'T','2007-09-12',4,1,'5','High','No','No',4,NULL,'This paper is theoretical and contains only a review of techniques applied on Generative Design. The paper is well organized and contains suitable amount of illustration. This type of paper doe not produce a new output or extend the Generative Design methods. However, it can be useful for readers to read a summary of these techniques. \r\n\r\nGeneral Notes:\r\n- Change the title so that it reflects the nature of the paper content. Use something like ‘A survey, a review, …etc.’\r\n- Please keep the number of pages within the maximum limits 16 pages.\r\n'),(78,42,'T','2007-08-26',5,1,'2','High','No','Yes',4,'This paper should be considered particularly in the area of digital design tool.','This topic is interesting and important in the area of CAAD. There are a few important writing that could be used as an important references.\r\n\r\nCinema & architecture: by Maureen Thomas (book)\r\n\r\nAhmad Rafi (1999) Visualisation of Design Using Animation for Virtual Prototyping, Architectural Computing from Turing to 2000 [eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9523687-5-7] Liverpool (UK) 15-17 September 1999, pp. 519-525\r\n\r\nRafi A, Karboulonis P (2003) Design considerations for the design of an advanced VR interface for knowledge management and its relevance to CAD, Automation in Construction\r\n\r\nBridges, Alan (1995) Design Precedents for Virtual Worlds, Sixth International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures [ISBN 9971-62-423-0] Singapore, 24-26 September 1995, pp. 293-302\r\n\r\nThis research should elaborate on significant values that  represents each of the study. This may also affect visualisation tools \r\nfor different stages of architectural design process.'),(81,42,'T','2007-08-26',5,3,'1','Moderate','Yes','Yes',4,'This paper has the potential to be accepted upon getting the full paper submission.','There is not much info on the area of theatrical design using computional methods. This topic could be very interesting to the CAD communities.\r\n\r\nHighlighting the tools, methods & impact to evaluate theatrical design would be the focus of interest.\r\n\r\n'),(80,18,'T','2007-09-02',6,3,'1,2','High','No','Yes',2,'a great paper and idea. good to have in your conferncne. I hope the author can focus on the idea and be very sharp it in','This is an interesting paper and takes a novel approach to communicating cultural and knowledge. It is important that values of the architect and the public can have a platform that goes beyond the traditional planar presentation.\r\nThe paper however is not focused and sharp enough. It should be much more focused on the \'pod\' and its possibilities. The title of the paper is therefore also to broad and missleading. I suggest to make it clear simple and present your idea concise and short.\r\nThe presentatation of the info (text images size spacing etc) in the tables could be enhanced. \r\n'),(74,53,'T','2007-08-27',5,3,'1,3,4','Moderate','Yes','Yes',4,'Very good project, no doubts and good for publishing. The problem and goals of research are well described and necessary in the field of computer supported design.','I’m very intrigued by your interdisciplinary investigation and I believe you are on the right track. Well written describing clear aspects of design methodologies for human space and product design by motion capture of human activity. \r\nThe paper is well structured – from the initial situation, the goals of research (initial situate, e.g. motion tracking, the research background and research method etc.) through to the experiment and the reflection on interdisciplinary collaboration are well described. The paper follows a golden thread and the paragraphs are balanced. The illustrations and the text are complements each other. Looking forward to an interesting debate and of course a demonstration of outstanding prototypes. \r\n'),(79,16,'T','2007-08-30',4,NULL,'1','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'It is very welcome to include paper which present data from real case studies. In this case, however, I feel a bit disappointed with the lack of good analysis. ','It is very welcome to include paper which present data from real case studies. In this case, however, I feel a bit disappointed with the lack of good analysis. '),(147,34,'T','2007-09-02',2,3,'4','High','No','No',4,'•	The English needs editing; it contains plenty of grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Different parts of the paper are very poorly written which makes reading very difficult.\r\n•	The format of the references is NOT uniform, NOT correct and NOT complete\r\n•	Some paragraphs are typed in different font sizes\r\n•	All plans in fig. (9) need to be rotated to match the base scheme orientation in fig. (8)\r\n•	Symbols and letters in fig. (9) and Table [1] do NOT match completely\r\n•	Bs: Sec Bathroom is not present in any of the drawings in fig. (9)\r\n•	Table [1] contains symbols and letters that are NOT referenced in the text of the paper or in the drawings in fig. (9)\r\n•	Using different terms having the same meaning; e.g. “transformation rules” and “permutation laws”\r\n•	Fig. (13) contains unknown initials which are NOT referenced in the paper’s text\r\n•	The form of the equation-like formula in page 12 is mathematically questionable\r\n•	All internet sites and URLs do not show any access dates \r\n','•	The paper in general needs a lot of editing concerning grammar, spelling and punctuation\r\n•	Use the same font size for the same paragraph, examples in pages 8 & 14\r\n•	Rotate all plans in fig. (9) to match the orientation of the base scheme in fig. (8)\r\n•	Reference all letters in figures (9), (13) and Table [1] in the paper’s text\r\n•	Point “1” in the Recommendations is irrelevant to the paper’s theme\r\n•	Keep the same format for all references at the end of the paper. They are NOT complete, they have different formats. All author’s names in the references should be mentioned; do NOT use “& others” in the references use “et al” instead.\r\n'),(88,17,'T','2007-09-02',5,3,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',NULL,NULL,'•	Abstract is too concise.\r\n•	Figures 1, 3 & 5 are not clearly referred to within the text.\r\n•	Some sentences need revision to ensure clear readability; such as 2.3.3.: “In essence, for each object in the agents focus a cone extending from the expected vantage point and including the objects bounding sphere is calculated and avoided as if it where a solid object.”\r\n•	Consider black/white printing when referring to colors of objects.\r\n'),(89,17,'T','2007-09-02',5,4,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',NULL,'\r\n','•	The figures are not clearly referred to within the text.\r\n•	The ASCAAD required layout is not fully considered.'),(136,15,'T','2007-09-08',5,3,'1,4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The paper promises a fundamental new approach to architectural conceptualisation, learning from advances in digital technology. ',NULL),(111,7,'T','2007-08-27',4,3,'1,2,3','High','No','Yes',4,'-	Questionnaire form including interview question should be in an appendix at the end of the paper.\r\n-	Some analysis and figures have to be made to highlight the main points of survey results. There should be more than just some numbers and percentages. If possible, statistic software like SPASS or Statistica may be useful.','-	Questionnaire form including interview question should be in an appendix at the end of the paper.\r\n-	Some analysis and figures have to be made to highlight the main points of survey results. There should be more than just some numbers and percentages. If possible, statistic software like SPASS or Statistica may be useful.'),(143,6,'T','2007-08-29',1,4,'5,6','Moderate','No','No',4,'The paper does not have anything at all.\r\nIt is two pages of a very general review that I can find anywhere.\r\nI strongly advise against accepting this paper.\r\n','Initially the abstract was of a high standard. However, the paper seems to have not much departed from the abstract.\r\nThere is no question that this paper is trying to answer, and there is no method of experimentation. \r\nAlternatively, a critical review of literature could have been  provided, but no.\r\nThe paper does not have the elements of a research paper, i.e. question or problem\r\nLiterature review\r\nMethodology and experimentation\r\nDiscussion\r\nConclusion\r\n\r\n'),(122,3,'T','2007-09-01',3,NULL,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'When I accepted this abstract I mentioned that the author should clearly explain the suggested training approach of BIM in the architectural teaching. However, I found the paper is a gathering or articles about BIM and not either a technical or research-based study.','this paper presents different view about the challenging areas of implementing BIM in architectural teaching and curricula. Reading this paper I found a collection of observations made by authors from various resources. What I was waiting for to read is an actual and small experiment of how the author tested the proposed BIM strategy in an actual design studio experiment.  It is important that the work in this paper presents an evaluation with some evidence instead of gathered articles.'),(52,58,'T','2007-09-02',4,2,'4,5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The thesis of this paper is interesting, but it deals with rapidly changing aspects; both of the virtual space and people’s behaviors alter and concrete principles seem not to exist. So I would suggest the author to comment current status to enhance his/her analysis. Therefore, I place this paper as Marginal Tend to Accept.','The cases that the author presents are comprehensible, but some of them are out of date; e.g. Digital City Kyoto has not been updated since October 2001. Currently some people communicate by exchanging information and construct a kind of virtual community and virtual trust via easy and common platform such as social networking services and blogs and the Internet-based cartography systems such as Google Earth allow people extract and customize geographical information much more easily instead of a single full fledged virtual public space. Since the author’s finding that the each public space has its main purposes and characteristics is understandable, so the author might need to mention current aspects to reinforce his/her focal points. \r\nIn table 4, scoring criteria and weight points are not easy to understand. The author need to clarify how they are assigned these numerical values, otherwise this analysis seems to be very subjective.\r\nFor details, Kyoto Digital City is not correct, it is Digital City Kyoto. Some typos grammatical errs are also found; e.g. internet and Internet coexist and the use of among instead of between, so correct them carefully.'),(41,59,'T','2007-08-25',5,1,'2,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,NULL,'- i wish visuals were included, they are very important to this paper. if accepted, author must include them for the final presentation at conference.\r\n\r\n- conclusion feels a bit incomplete, i cannot perceive the author\'s personal comment on surface driven architecture very clearly...'),(46,59,'T','2007-08-25',4,2,'2','High','No','Yes',4,'probably wins the longest paper title award:)','i am not sure that this is a universal solution to the specific problem, and without the presence of a case study as a test of this method and related analytical graphics, informational visuals there is not much possibility of commenting on the method.'),(49,59,'T','2007-08-25',2,2,'5','High','No','Yes',4,NULL,'conclusion is very short and not directly related to the title of the paper, which makes one think that the author lost the connection somewhere. the informational content for the different projects is too factual and not thoroughly visualized wth the help of figures. i expected to see many more visuals.'),(57,59,'T','2007-08-25',6,3,'1,3,4','Moderate','Yes','Yes',4,NULL,'text in the final presentation at conference should not be too long; key concepts and phases of methods should be presented in a short/concise way and in cooperation with many visuals, in order for the audience to perceive the valuable study quick and easily.'),(17,60,'T','2007-09-02',4,1,'1,4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'There is little technical proof of the feasibility of the concept. Beyond a broad skeleton, the author did not show enough ideas of implementation.  ','Review language.\r\nMy concern is that the aspects the author talking about are part of the design process which does not necessarily benefit from a BIM model of the building, or even involve utilizing one. BIM is basically for physical qualities of the building. It would have been more beneficial if a discussion regarding how other aspect than physical attributes could be added to such a model.\r\n'),(89,3,'T','2007-09-05',5,4,'3,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,NULL,'This is a well written paper showing the author experience in applying interactive media to teach student technical graphics. The paper is well structured and it shows deep appreciation of problems facing teaching these days. The final results and feedback from students using such interactive lessons are presented and very well discussed. '),(38,50,'T','2007-09-08',2,1,'5','High','No','Unsure',4,'A generic discussion presented, author needs to clarify methodology for the study.\r\nThe paper does not present a coherent scientific arguement.It is rather a list of some projects without even a comparative case study methodology.','The methodology by which the research intends to explore the effect oof ntelligent buildings on human life needs to be clarified.\r\nIs this research based on comparative case studies or another approach is adopted? This needs to be clarified\r\nPaper Review:\r\nUnfortunately it seems that the review comments on the abstract have not been addressed. The paper seems to be a list of projects without any analysis. It is ambiguous how the buildings presented relate to the authors hypothesis. There is no proof that the social context or users comfort was not considered in these projects.\r\nThere is no comparative analysis nor conclusions to the paper.'),(47,10,'T','2007-09-06',6,3,'1,4','Moderate','Yes','Yes',NULL,'very interesting topic and will bring new prespective to the role of the public in defining the role of technology in architecture. ','Interesting topic'),(97,10,'T','2007-09-05',1,1,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'Very theoretical approach. I recommend rejecting the paper. It has no value. ','The topic is very interesting.  However, the value that\'s supposedly be added by publishing such paper is NOT there. What has been discussed is superficial and deeper discussion and details are needed to be accepted as a paper. The conceptual framework should be reliable enough and well structured to be taken to the next step which is the implementation. There is a lot of information missing in the know-how part. '),(120,10,'T','2007-09-06',5,3,'3','Low','Yes','Yes',NULL,NULL,'It is very interesting topic.\r\n\r\nHowever, the author is missing very critical part of this collaborative exercise which is;\r\nWhat the students learned regarding the technical differences and characteristics of using the same digital tools in a collaborative methodology vs. individualistic one? For instance, structuring the data files, naming the files, the needs for agreed upon document/CAD standards, etc.  \r\n\r\nThe importance of evolving CAD standards and methodology is very relevant to this exercise. Think about how large scale projects (high rise buildings) are designed and developed by large AE firms where consultants are scattered all over the world. \r\n\r\n\r\n'),(40,6,'T','2007-09-02',1,5,'5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'I strongly vote for reject.\r\n\r\nIt is a report on the system with some examples. It was not compared to a previous or another competing system. It also was not criticised. There no experiment or research at all.\r\n\r\nI think Branko will not be very pleased if he reads this paper for it is mainly a abstraction of Architecture in the Digital Age\r\n','The paper is mainly a report of the system, but has not much new in it.\r\nPerhaps it was supposed to have a sort of comparison that highlights the system as a result of a specific requirement.\r\n\r\nThe conclusion does not reflect an impartial view on the whole system on its own, and as compared to other systems. It is mainly a list of objectives that the developers of the system had in mind.\r\n\r\nThe paper should have more about the effect of CAM on the process of design and defend the view against others against it. \r\n\r\nThe paper lacks the research work beyond surveying existent technology.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThe paper needs to be proofread for typos and mistakes.\r\n\r\nSometimes Expressions are capitalised, and sometimes they are written with small letters, try to be consistent.\r\n\r\nThe last two sentences in the abstract need review. \r\nWhen citing in text, please only write (Surname, year, page) and the rest put back in the bibliography. Same for images sources. Please keep footnotes for personal notes. When referencing use the in text, this is particularly in reference to the footnote in page 10.\r\n\r\n\r\n'),(124,10,'T','2007-09-06',3,2,'3','Low','No','Yes',4,'Interesting topic but the author should be directed to address the above comments. ','The topic is very interesting.  \r\n\r\nHowever, there is a need for an intensive review for the paper format considering the following comments\r\n1. Apply ASCAAD approved paper format in all sections of the paper.\r\n2. Use the letter \"O\" and not the zero \"0\"\r\n3. Use of small and capital letters consistently and where appropriate\r\n4. Use of normal and bold letters consistently and where appropriate\r\n5. Use of italic and underlined letters consistently and where appropriate\r\n6. The numbering system used throughout the paper is misleading\r\n7. Use of the same sentence structure in your paragraphs (e.g. Part 1 – 1,2,3,4, etc)\r\n\r\nIn the traditional methods sections: The author defined what they are without mentioning the advantages and disadvantages of using each type.\r\n\r\nSome paragraphs in item 3.7 needed to re-written. The idea that was intended to be communicated through this item is a little bit fragmented.\r\n\r\nThe paper is missing very critical info about the model:\r\n• How the programmed matrix can be used in education?\r\n• How to structure the model data files so they can be viewed by different people in different ways.\r\n• What are the user needs and interest in using such tool and how the model can address them? (e.g. building materials, construction systems, art, culture, etc)\r\n• No effort is shown in the paper to compare the author experience in documenting historical heritages digitally to other similar efforts in other countries.\r\n• The second step of \"data analysis\" should include a very critical point which is \"defining the users needs and interest\" which will dramatically affect the third step.  \r\n '),(157,6,'T','2007-09-02',5,4,'1,2','High','Unsure','No',4,'I would like to highly commend this abstract. A must accept. I do not think there are any comments necessary for now.\r\n\r\nPerhaps the conclusion needs more and the paper needs an english proofreading.\r\n','The paper requires a proofreading as there are numerous grammatical and typos. Sometimes, the sentences or expressions in sentences are not fitting the meaning.\r\nPlease do review.\r\n\r\n\r\nThe paper size should not exceed 16 pages in any case. So, please adjust.\r\nI would like to read more in the conclusion as it is relatively short.\r\n'),(31,48,'T','2007-09-11',4,4,'4,5','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'The abstract should reflect a clear idea and not a collation of peripheral informations. Only the last paragraph reflects a clear idea for the full paper. ','The paper is very interesting and should bring interesting debate on the use of simple methods and equipments to identify visual and lighting pollution within urban fabric components. Parallel studies dealing with the urban and architectural spaces\' users could have been added to validate the method. Alternative lighting solutions or correction could have been suggested. But the paper is still interesting in its actual form.'),(24,17,'T','2007-09-02',6,3,'4','High','Yes','Yes',NULL,NULL,'•	The presented work is very well put together; however, there exist some spelling and grammar mistakes. For example:  a) in the abstract: Overall, the research demonstrate(s) the power of internet that…; b) section 4.1: The household profile here indicates the major occupants for the new house and does not relate(d) with…; c) section 4.1 again: The content of (the) question will (be) base(d) upon the answer of the previous (preceding/prior) question. In some cases, this question tries to determine the future needs of the room requirement(s). For instance, a young couple plan(ning) to have children will affect (the number of bedrooms) in the list of required spaces.\r\n•	When referring to a part of a figure, it’s enough to state “figure 8 left” with no need to mention the word “image”.\r\n•	After the 2nd phase of your design process a plan layout is automatically generated. Does this output represent a bubble diagram, i.e. just a diagrammatic layout, or does it represent a complete plan layout? Or let’s put it in another way, you generate a layout based upon the different chosen spaces and their adjacency preferences. However, these inputs might generate more than one layout. How do you determine the most appropriate one? Is the end-user knowledgeable enough to make the right choice? \r\n•	The generated layout in figure 6 left is too small to be readable.\r\n•	i_Prefab was never mentioned before page 7. It’s clear that it’s the name of the developed application. However, it is advisory to clear that out from the beginning of describing your tool.\r\n•	i_Prefab limited the role of the architect to reviewing and revising the layout “designed” by the end user, i.e. it eliminated the creative role of the architect. Do you believe this will encourage architects to use your suggested system? In other words, you need to clearly state that architects are NOT the main user target group of such an application, but it’s rather online catalogue house design providers (if this is the case).\r\n•	There is no “figure 10”, but you jumped from 9 directly to 11.\r\n•	You can replace “conclusion” with “conclusion & outlook”, since you propose future work in that paragraph as well.'),(30,17,'T','2007-09-02',3,4,'5','High','No','Yes',NULL,'* the presented papers would fall under \"GIS in Planning\" rather than GIS in Architecture, however, there is no category for planning listed.\r\n* the language needs extensive revision. The difference is evident between paragraphs used from previous papers, and others written by the author.\r\n* The way the paper is currently written does NOT show the amount of work carried out; more emphasis needs to be put on practical parts carried out by the researcher.','•	The language (both spelling and grammar) and sentence structures need extensive revision. For example: The extent to which they can provide a complete description of the situation is very “limits” as they always...; … takes a long time, which assists in the delay of “decision and in turn in strategic plans”.\r\n•	The abstract needs to be modified, since it’s a copy from the last paragraph on page 2.\r\n•	The style of writing references within the text needs correction. When the number of authors exceeds a two authors, one just writes “First Author et al.”.\r\n•	Is it HiWaMIS or HyWaMis that stands for Hyderabad Water Management Information System? When both the full name and the acronym are stated once, there is no need to repeat the full name again (2nd page, 5th paragraph).\r\n•	 In the 2nd section, Geographical setting, the area of the lake is stated in km, instead on km2.\r\n•	Smalls and capitals need to be checked, (section 2.1. 2nd paragraph).\r\n•	“Decision makers would take their decision to stop these charges by indicating the factors that affect the lake seriously which will be detected through GIS application, so that urban planners and decision makers can move as shown in figure 1.” It is not clear, how figure 1 indicates the “moves” of urban planners and decision makers. \r\n•	Table 1; Figures 2, 3; as well as Graphs 1 & 2 are not clearly referred to within the text.\r\n•	Consider black/white printing when referring to colors of objects.\r\n•	It was stated at the end of the introduction that section 4 of the paper will “describe the mapping technique to examine contamination of water…”. However, only the “results” were projected in that section without any details of the means and methodologies of reaching those results.\r\n•	It would significantly enhance the work, if more stress is given to particulars rather than generals. So instead of stating the capabilities of GIS, more focus needs to be given on the methodology carried out in this research.\r\n•	There is no clear mentioning of the attribute data used to come out with the research results. Mentioning this data (as few as they might be), and how they were processed, will increase the value of the presented work.'),(78,15,'T','2007-09-08',6,2,'1,4','High','Yes','Yes',4,'Clear accept.','It would be helpful for the reader to include some examples of pre-vis from the film idustry in order to further address the intended point'),(77,3,'T','2007-09-12',5,3,'4','Moderate','No','Yes',4,NULL,'The paper provides critical insight and clear on digital design method ‘process-driven’ in architecture. It is time to debate about this topic as the methods are now becoming a reality in design project.'),(97,3,'T','2007-09-12',4,3,'2','Moderate','No','Yes',4,'A short paper but focusing on a real-world problem.','An interesting paper describing an automated approach for reporting on construction work progress. The problem, investigation, and method are well studied. If possible, can you provide 1-2 additional examples of how the automatic detection of elements from the image works?'),(48,6,'T','2007-09-15',5,2,'4','Moderate','Unsure','Yes',4,'The Paper will add to the Arab Library although it is not very much related tot he theme. ','Please pay attention to references as they will be a great aid to readers in contextualising the paper. Interesting photos and figures , but need more clarification and connecting to the text.'),(118,6,'T','2007-09-12',1,2,'5','Moderate','No','No',4,'I strongly suggest that paper to be rejected.\r\nIt is highly irrelevant to the conference topic, and the only positive point is the system that the author is devising, but it is not really presented in the paper.\r\n','The paper talks about introducing a system, but never described it. and the reader would be disappointed not to learn about it.\r\nWhile the geometric ornamentation is documented wit references, magic squares seems t have no source of documentation. Will you please reference it?\r\n\r\nYou started one of the paragraphs with \"Coyne et al argue...\" but you never referenced that.\r\n\r\nThe paper is missing the element of research. It is an introduction, but there is no actual research or experimentation.\r\n\r\nThere are many typos all over the paper.\r\nThere is no consistency in using British and American English, e.g. color/colour. Please use only one.\r\n\r\n'),(120,6,'T','2007-09-14',5,2,'2','Moderate','Unsure','No',4,'a well developed paper, and i recommend it to be included.','Great work.\r\n\r\nThe proposed course content needs clarification in order to highlight the multidisciplinary aspects of it.\r\n\r\nMethodology section needs more clarification, because it seems to be the crux of your project.\r\nSelf reports are one of the great methods for getting qualitative information and insights, so we would like to know more about it, and about the aspects of course that attracted negative comments from students.\r\n\r\nThere are several typos in the text, and please adhere to the template and limit the page number to 16 pages.\r\n'),(87,15,'T','2007-09-08',4,5,'4','High','No','No',4,'New design idea\r\nRelevant to conference\r\nLacks structure\r\n\r\nToo much emphasis put on the literature review (14 pages). Auhtor is asked to cut this section out and summarise in max one page.\r\n\r\nNo scientific argument was introduced\r\nWeak relationship between defined problem and proposed solution\r\nAbstract would be more suited for marketing literature','Interesting new perspective. Could be relevant to the conference theme.\r\n\r\nNo clear structure was found. More focus on the idea then on the related arguments\r\n\r\nToo much emphasis put on the literature review (14 pages). Please cut this section out and summarise in max one page.\r\n'),(91,15,'T','2007-09-08',5,4,'4','High','No','Yes',4,'Clear accept\r\n',NULL),(64,3,'T','2007-09-12',4,2,'2','Low','No','No',4,NULL,'the author mentions in the paper that his/her work is part of the PhD research. Please reduce the paper length not more than 16 pages including references.\r\n\r\nGeneral Notes: \r\n- The introduction section ‘1’ is too long and I think it can be brief by focusing on the related literature. May be within maximum of two pages. The same thing applies on the concusion part.\r\n- This paper is too long and definitely need to be trimmed to become within the maximum ASCAAD limits ‘16’ pages. It is difficult and trying for the user to only find the most important sentence ‘The present research intends to study…’ at page 10.\r\n- There is no need to include the research questionnaire at the end of the paper. Instead, organize them in sub-section within the body of the paper. It is more comfortable fo the reader to read the question, answer and any feedback from interviewees in one paragraph/section.\r\n'),(101,7,'T','2007-08-27',4,5,'5','High','No','Yes',4,'Comments:\r\n-	Figure 1 is not completed, needs an addition to be understood.\r\n-	There is some redundancy in figures. Few figures are duplicate and others need separate comments. Comments have to clearly illustrate each part of the figure. Comments should be written on each figure or small groups (one figure may include 2-3 drawings). For example, what is the difference between 19 and 20, or what do the lines and colors of these figures indicate? Please apply this to all figures.\r\n-	Changing the form according to the potentials, as what displays in figure 21, needs more analysis to strengthen the theory part. How many design alternatives did they have? What are the differences between these design alternatives, regarding: code, cost, concepts, etc.?\r\n-	Figures of physical programs do not specify whether these figures are for one building or a group of buildings? Much illustration is needed regarding this.\r\n-	The results and conclusion are broad. Some analysis, as mentioned before, is needed to establish a basis for these results and conclusion.\r\n-	The writing style is not according to the conference writing style.\r\n','Comments:\r\n-	Figure 1 is not completed, needs an addition to be understood.\r\n-	There is some redundancy in figures. Few figures are duplicate and others need separate comments. Comments have to clearly illustrate each part of the figure. Comments should be written on each figure or small groups (one figure may include 2-3 drawings). For example, what is the difference between 19 and 20, or what do the lines and colors of these figures indicate? Please apply this to all figures.\r\n-	Changing the form according to the potentials, as what displays in figure 21, needs more analysis to strengthen the theory part. How many design alternatives did they have? What are the differences between these design alternatives, regarding: code, cost, concepts, etc.?\r\n-	Figures of physical programs do not specify whether these figures are for one building or a group of buildings? Much illustration is needed regarding this.\r\n-	The results and conclusion are broad. Some analysis, as mentioned before, is needed to establish a basis for these results and conclusion.\r\n-	The writing style is not according to the conference writing style.'),(166,67,'F',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL),(12,3,'T','2007-09-01',2,3,'2,4,5','High','No','Yes',4,'It was very hard to understand the research in this paper mainly because the poor Arabic wording and translation of English into Arabic ‘as is’. I could only figure out the research work because the text included some English terms. I would like to suggest that another reviewer of Arabic background read this paper.','In general, I was able to understand what this paper about not because of reading it but because it contained English terminologies which I am familiar with. The topic of finding optimum design layout is not new but challenging for its application in Mosques design. But the regular reader would not benefit from reading this paper. The paper is written in a poor Arabic language and I assume that is due to the word-by-word translation from English to Arabic. Many many sentences did not make any sense to me because of the weak Arabic wording language. The author should re-write this whole paper in a very simple Arabic language. Otherwise, submit it in English. I have a few notes for improving this paper and research:\r\n- Always avoid sentences that go more than 3 lines in length. One example of this is in the abstract where by one sentence is written in 14 lines. Instead, use short sentences and break the abstract to smaller sections be more informative: research problem, approach, method and implementation, and important results found. \r\n- It was surprising that first 8 pages were written without a single diagrammatic or visual illustration for such graphical-nature research topic. This will make it easier for the reader to understand the variables and parameters presented in solving spatial aspects of Mosques design and layout.\r\n- The author did not mention which type of Mosques Architecture are under study. There are some differences between Ottoman, Mamlook, Amawy, etc. Mosuque design style. \r\n- Avoid using footnotes and add the explanation within the text.\r\n- I repeat again the Arabic translation is probably taken from an English-to-Arabic dictionary and a word-by-word translation is weak approach. Please use simple Arabic language. Many examples are like: what is meant by &#1575;&#1604;&#1582;&#1608;&#1575;&#1585;&#1586;&#1605;&#1610;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1580;&#1610;&#1606;&#1610;&#1577;. There is no way that ‘Evolutionary Algorithm’ is translated into [&#1575;&#1604;&#1582;&#1608;&#1575;&#1585;&#1586;&#1605;&#1610;&#1575;&#1578; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1591;&#1608;&#1585;&#1610;&#1577;]. What does the word [&#1575;&#1606;&#1578;&#1582;&#1575;&#1576; ] mean in [&#1604;&#1602;&#1583; &#1578;&#1605; &#1575;&#1606;&#1578;&#1582;&#1575;&#1576; &#1576;&#1585;&#1606;&#1575;&#1605;&#1580; \"PLANOPT\" &#1604;&#1575;&#1606;&#1578;&#1575;&#1580; &#1575;&#1604;&#1576;&#1583;&#1575;&#1574;&#1604; &#1575;&#1604;&#1578;&#1589;&#1605;&#1610;&#1605;&#1610;&#1577;]. And many other strange Arabic wording that made the paper weak to read.\r\n'),(160,3,'T','2007-09-04',5,3,'2,3,4','High','Unsure','Yes',4,'Excellent paper and will generate great debate in the conference.','the concept of adaptive system to design high-rise buildings in this paper is well organized. The paper is ready for publishing in the conference with minor alterations and it will improve even better when the author writes a small section describing the overall system architecture of EVOLO TOWER tool in relation with generative components. Some readers will be interested in the technical side of the development and even seeing good references to technical illustrations and materials.\r\n\r\nI also would like to point to the following modifications hopefully it will improve the language and writing in this paper:\r\n\r\n- Where has the abstract gone?\r\n- Page 1, paragraph 2 use ‘it’s’ instead of ‘… a lung in his skin…’\r\n- Always remember to elaborate of describing all figures from within the text and also explain the figures themselves within the text.\r\n- Page 2, paragraph 4: place a figure illustrating the concept behind ‘Kagome’ truss. Not all readers will figure that out by themselves.\r\n- Page 5, paragraph 3: did you mean ‘… safe-fail concept…’ instead of ‘… fail-safe concept…’. I am confused can you elaborate more!!\r\n- The conclusion section is too long. It will be better if it is divided to ‘Conclusion’ and ‘Future Work’ separate sections.\r\n- In the conclusion section: pay attention to language in sentences like in the second paragraph of the conclusion as they appear they belong to the ‘Introduction’ section. Sentences like ‘To develop…’, ‘… to find out..’, etc.\r\n');

--
-- Table structure for table `papersession`
--

CREATE TABLE `papersession` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `reviewerid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `topicid` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`reviewerid`,`topicid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `papersession`
--

INSERT INTO `papersession` (`paperid`, `reviewerid`, `topicid`) VALUES (11,6,17),(11,6,18),(11,6,19),(11,7,19),(12,3,5),(12,3,6),(12,3,9),(12,3,10),(12,7,7),(12,7,9),(12,32,9),(12,54,7),(13,3,1),(13,3,7),(13,21,7),(17,3,7),(17,3,8),(17,3,9),(17,3,11),(17,60,5),(17,60,8),(17,60,11),(17,60,18),(18,3,7),(18,3,12),(18,6,9),(18,6,11),(19,24,4),(19,27,4),(19,27,9),(19,27,14),(20,3,2),(20,18,2),(20,18,6),(21,6,13),(21,6,17),(21,7,21),(21,12,2),(21,12,17),(22,6,1),(22,6,12),(22,18,7),(22,18,8),(24,17,8),(24,17,13),(24,17,21),(24,31,6),(24,31,8),(24,31,9),(24,31,11),(24,31,13),(24,31,15),(24,31,21),(30,3,2),(30,3,3),(30,3,14),(30,17,3),(31,29,3),(31,29,14),(31,48,2),(31,48,3),(32,40,2),(32,40,21),(32,51,3),(32,51,14),(32,51,21),(33,16,5),(33,21,1),(33,21,7),(33,21,10),(34,3,11),(34,58,11),(34,58,14),(35,60,5),(35,60,9),(36,48,17),(36,48,18),(36,48,19),(36,50,17),(37,15,5),(37,15,8),(37,15,9),(37,23,4),(37,23,8),(37,23,20),(38,21,5),(38,50,5),(40,6,9),(40,6,10),(40,6,14),(40,10,9),(40,10,16),(40,10,18),(40,10,20),(41,58,12),(41,59,6),(41,59,12),(41,59,16),(41,59,18),(41,59,20),(42,3,9),(42,3,17),(42,3,19),(42,7,1),(43,51,7),(43,58,17),(45,3,13),(45,3,17),(45,6,13),(45,21,2),(45,21,17),(46,49,2),(46,49,3),(46,49,9),(46,49,11),(46,49,18),(46,59,2),(46,59,3),(46,59,4),(46,59,7),(46,59,9),(46,59,17),(47,10,6),(47,44,1),(47,44,9),(47,44,11),(47,44,13),(47,44,14),(47,44,21),(48,3,2),(49,26,7),(49,59,7),(49,59,9),(49,59,18),(52,15,2),(52,15,19),(52,58,14),(52,58,17),(52,58,19),(52,58,21),(56,26,7),(56,28,6),(56,28,9),(56,28,16),(56,53,6),(56,53,9),(56,53,14),(56,53,20),(57,27,1),(57,27,7),(57,27,8),(57,27,11),(57,28,1),(57,28,9),(57,28,16),(57,59,1),(57,59,4),(57,59,5),(57,59,7),(57,59,9),(57,59,10),(57,59,11),(57,59,18),(60,34,17),(60,34,18),(60,53,9),(60,53,18),(60,53,20),(61,18,8),(61,31,1),(61,31,5),(61,31,7),(61,31,8),(64,3,1),(67,17,19),(67,23,7),(67,23,9),(72,38,1),(72,38,17),(72,39,17),(74,28,6),(74,28,10),(74,28,16),(74,38,5),(74,38,7),(74,38,16),(74,53,16),(74,53,17),(74,53,19),(74,53,20),(75,44,14),(75,44,17),(75,44,19),(75,56,17),(75,56,18),(75,56,19),(76,16,19),(76,49,1),(76,49,5),(76,49,6),(76,49,11),(76,49,12),(76,49,17),(76,49,18),(76,49,19),(76,56,14),(76,56,17),(76,56,18),(76,56,19),(77,3,7),(77,3,12),(77,38,4),(77,38,7),(77,38,12),(78,15,6),(78,15,7),(78,15,11),(78,42,9),(78,42,18),(79,16,8),(79,53,8),(80,14,13),(80,14,14),(80,14,20),(80,18,7),(80,18,14),(80,18,16),(80,18,17),(81,9,6),(81,9,18),(81,42,9),(81,42,18),(82,9,7),(82,9,17),(82,9,21),(82,65,17),(82,65,21),(86,14,2),(86,14,3),(86,14,9),(86,19,2),(87,15,12),(87,64,15),(88,6,5),(88,17,9),(88,17,11),(88,17,17),(88,17,18),(88,17,19),(89,3,1),(89,3,4),(89,3,6),(89,3,10),(89,3,17),(89,3,19),(89,17,1),(90,52,1),(90,52,5),(90,52,7),(90,52,8),(90,52,9),(90,52,11),(90,54,1),(90,54,9),(90,54,11),(91,15,14),(91,15,19),(91,60,14),(93,23,1),(93,23,7),(93,39,14),(93,60,1),(97,3,8),(97,3,11),(97,10,20),(97,60,8),(97,60,14),(98,21,11),(98,50,16),(98,50,17),(99,3,1),(99,3,6),(99,3,8),(99,3,9),(99,21,8),(101,7,9),(101,7,11),(101,7,17),(101,7,18),(101,7,20),(101,32,18),(101,34,9),(101,34,18),(111,7,7),(111,7,9),(111,7,10),(111,7,14),(111,52,4),(111,52,17),(116,3,4),(116,3,17),(116,3,21),(116,38,17),(118,7,1),(120,6,1),(120,10,1),(122,3,1),(122,3,8),(124,10,6),(124,10,9),(124,10,18),(124,38,11),(124,38,17),(125,19,7),(125,19,11),(125,38,3),(125,38,19),(126,3,18),(126,14,7),(126,14,18),(126,42,18),(128,6,9),(128,6,10),(128,6,14),(128,55,7),(129,3,7),(129,3,12),(129,55,7),(129,65,7),(129,65,9),(131,3,4),(131,3,8),(131,60,8),(131,60,14),(135,3,7),(135,3,12),(135,55,7),(136,15,5),(136,15,9),(136,15,20),(136,26,9),(136,26,10),(137,52,12),(137,52,17),(137,52,18),(137,52,19),(137,64,5),(138,64,4),(139,7,1),(140,17,2),(140,17,3),(140,19,2),(140,19,3),(140,19,11),(143,6,5),(143,6,6),(143,6,7),(143,6,12),(145,38,7),(145,38,9),(145,48,7),(145,48,10),(145,48,14),(145,50,17),(147,17,13),(147,17,21),(147,34,4),(147,34,9),(147,34,15),(148,29,2),(148,29,16),(148,54,2),(148,54,9),(149,27,2),(149,27,3),(149,27,14),(149,27,17),(149,27,18),(149,46,2),(149,49,3),(149,49,11),(149,49,14),(149,49,16),(149,49,17),(150,42,1),(151,23,1),(151,23,7),(151,34,1),(155,3,7),(155,48,12),(155,48,19),(155,48,20),(155,60,9),(157,6,13),(157,6,17),(157,6,19),(157,7,13),(157,7,19),(160,3,5),(160,3,6),(160,3,8),(160,3,10),(160,3,12),(160,46,16),(163,6,2),(163,6,3),(163,6,11),(163,44,2),(163,44,3),(163,44,11),(163,44,17),(163,61,2),(163,61,21),(164,31,7),(164,31,9),(164,31,14),(164,56,7),(164,56,14),(165,3,1),(165,65,1),(166,6,20),(166,68,11),(166,68,18),(166,68,19),(167,7,17),(167,34,17);

--
-- Table structure for table `papertopic`
--

CREATE TABLE `papertopic` (
  `paperid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `topicid` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`paperid`,`topicid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `papertopic`
--

INSERT INTO `papertopic` (`paperid`, `topicid`) VALUES (11,18),(12,7),(13,7),(17,8),(18,9),(18,11),(18,13),(19,4),(19,9),(19,11),(19,21),(20,2),(20,9),(20,14),(21,4),(21,7),(21,14),(21,17),(21,21),(22,20),(24,7),(24,8),(24,15),(24,21),(30,3),(30,8),(31,3),(31,14),(32,3),(32,9),(32,13),(32,14),(32,21),(33,5),(34,8),(34,11),(34,16),(35,4),(35,7),(35,9),(35,12),(35,15),(36,16),(36,18),(36,19),(37,8),(37,11),(37,19),(37,20),(38,5),(39,9),(40,8),(40,20),(41,7),(41,9),(41,10),(41,12),(42,9),(42,10),(42,13),(42,14),(42,19),(43,18),(43,19),(45,6),(45,7),(45,9),(45,13),(45,14),(46,2),(46,3),(46,4),(46,5),(46,6),(46,9),(46,10),(46,11),(46,13),(46,14),(46,17),(46,19),(46,20),(47,1),(47,6),(47,14),(48,2),(48,4),(49,7),(49,12),(49,20),(52,2),(52,17),(56,1),(56,6),(57,1),(57,4),(57,8),(57,15),(60,6),(60,12),(60,18),(61,8),(64,1),(67,6),(67,7),(67,9),(67,18),(72,1),(72,4),(72,9),(72,16),(72,18),(74,13),(75,5),(75,6),(75,7),(75,13),(76,14),(77,4),(77,7),(77,9),(77,12),(77,18),(77,20),(78,7),(78,11),(78,20),(79,8),(79,20),(80,13),(81,6),(81,7),(81,9),(81,14),(81,16),(82,1),(82,17),(82,18),(86,3),(87,4),(87,12),(87,15),(87,20),(88,5),(88,9),(88,16),(88,17),(89,1),(90,6),(90,7),(90,8),(90,9),(90,10),(90,12),(90,17),(91,8),(91,14),(91,19),(93,1),(93,6),(93,13),(93,14),(97,8),(97,17),(97,20),(98,16),(99,1),(99,8),(99,9),(99,10),(99,20),(101,18),(111,9),(111,18),(111,20),(116,4),(118,4),(118,12),(119,4),(119,7),(120,1),(120,4),(122,1),(122,8),(124,2),(125,6),(125,9),(125,11),(125,12),(125,16),(125,18),(126,12),(128,7),(128,9),(128,15),(129,7),(129,9),(129,12),(131,8),(135,1),(135,7),(135,9),(135,11),(135,12),(136,6),(136,7),(136,11),(137,6),(137,7),(137,19),(138,5),(139,5),(139,12),(140,2),(140,3),(140,11),(143,6),(143,7),(143,14),(145,4),(147,9),(147,13),(147,15),(148,1),(148,2),(148,6),(148,14),(149,1),(149,2),(149,6),(149,9),(149,11),(150,1),(150,18),(151,1),(151,7),(151,11),(155,20),(156,5),(156,6),(156,7),(156,9),(156,13),(156,16),(156,20),(157,17),(160,12),(161,1),(163,2),(164,6),(164,11),(164,18),(165,9),(166,20),(167,17);

--
-- Table structure for table `reviewertopic`
--

CREATE TABLE `reviewertopic` (
  `reviewerid` smallint(4) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `topicid` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`reviewerid`,`topicid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `reviewertopic`
--

INSERT INTO `reviewertopic` (`reviewerid`, `topicid`) VALUES (3,1),(3,2),(3,8),(3,10),(3,11),(3,12),(3,16),(3,18),(3,19),(3,20),(6,1),(6,6),(6,9),(6,10),(6,13),(6,16),(6,18),(6,19),(7,1),(7,4),(7,7),(7,9),(7,10),(7,11),(7,18),(7,21),(8,6),(8,7),(8,9),(8,10),(8,13),(8,16),(8,19),(9,1),(9,2),(9,4),(9,16),(10,8),(10,9),(11,1),(11,7),(11,19),(12,2),(12,4),(12,6),(12,8),(12,10),(12,13),(12,14),(12,18),(12,19),(12,20),(12,21),(13,1),(13,2),(13,6),(13,7),(13,9),(13,11),(13,16),(13,17),(13,18),(13,19),(14,1),(14,3),(14,6),(14,9),(14,11),(14,12),(14,13),(14,14),(14,16),(14,17),(14,18),(14,19),(15,4),(15,6),(15,8),(15,13),(15,14),(15,17),(15,21),(16,1),(16,2),(16,3),(16,4),(16,5),(16,6),(16,8),(16,9),(16,10),(16,11),(16,12),(16,13),(16,14),(16,15),(16,16),(16,17),(16,18),(16,19),(16,20),(16,21),(17,3),(17,5),(18,1),(18,4),(18,6),(18,8),(18,9),(18,12),(18,16),(18,17),(18,18),(18,19),(18,20),(19,1),(19,2),(19,3),(20,1),(20,6),(20,7),(20,9),(20,12),(20,16),(20,18),(20,21),(21,1),(21,4),(21,5),(21,7),(21,9),(21,10),(21,11),(21,12),(21,16),(21,17),(21,18),(21,21),(22,1),(22,4),(22,7),(22,9),(22,11),(22,12),(22,16),(22,17),(22,18),(22,19),(22,20),(22,21),(23,1),(23,6),(23,7),(23,8),(23,11),(24,1),(25,1),(26,1),(26,4),(26,6),(26,7),(26,8),(26,9),(26,13),(26,15),(27,1),(27,4),(27,18),(28,1),(29,5),(29,7),(29,9),(29,16),(30,1),(30,2),(30,8),(30,17),(30,20),(31,1),(32,19),(33,1),(34,1),(34,4),(34,9),(34,12),(34,19),(35,4),(35,7),(35,21),(37,1),(38,1),(38,8),(38,9),(39,1),(40,1),(41,1),(41,10),(41,11),(41,18),(41,19),(42,6),(42,14),(42,16),(42,18),(42,19),(42,20),(43,1),(43,4),(43,5),(43,7),(43,8),(43,9),(43,12),(43,17),(43,18),(43,19),(44,1),(44,2),(44,4),(44,7),(44,13),(44,14),(44,19),(45,1),(46,1),(46,4),(46,7),(46,8),(46,9),(46,11),(46,12),(46,14),(46,15),(46,16),(47,1),(48,1),(49,1),(50,4),(50,8),(50,18),(50,19),(51,3),(51,4),(51,7),(51,9),(51,11),(51,13),(51,17),(51,19),(51,20),(51,21),(52,6),(52,7),(52,9),(52,12),(52,18),(52,21),(53,1),(53,8),(53,9),(53,10),(53,11),(53,16),(53,17),(53,18),(53,19),(54,2),(54,7),(54,17),(54,20),(55,9),(56,1),(56,4),(56,18),(57,2),(57,7),(57,13),(57,16),(57,18),(58,1),(58,7),(58,15),(58,16),(58,19),(59,2),(59,4),(59,6),(59,13),(59,14),(59,18),(59,19),(59,21),(60,1),(60,8),(61,2),(61,3),(61,4),(61,6),(61,7),(61,9),(61,13),(61,14),(61,19),(61,21),(62,2),(62,4),(62,5),(62,7),(62,9),(62,13),(62,17),(62,18),(62,19),(63,8),(63,11),(63,17),(64,2),(64,3),(64,4),(64,5),(64,6),(64,7),(64,16),(64,17),(65,1),(65,6),(65,7),(65,9),(65,11),(65,13),(65,19),(66,1),(66,7),(66,15),(66,20),(67,20),(68,1);

--
-- Table structure for table `topic`
--

CREATE TABLE `topic` (
  `topicid` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
  `topicname` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '',
  `short` varchar(20) default NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`topicid`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

--
-- Dumping data for table `topic`
--

INSERT INTO `topic` (`topicid`, `topicname`, `short`) VALUES (1,'CAAD Curriculum: education, research and practice','CAAD Curriculum'),(2,'Urban City Modelling','Urban City Modelling'),(3,'GIS in Architecture','GIS in Architecture'),(4,'Tools for Collaborative Design','Collaborative Design'),(5,'Intelligent Design and Case Reasoning','Intelligent Design'),(6,'Creative Visualisation','Creative Visualisat.'),(7,'Design Methods and Representations','Design Methods'),(8,'Building Information Modelling (BIM)','BIM'),(9,'Digital Design Tools','Digital Design Tools'),(10,'Synthetic Methods of 3D Visualisation','Synthetic Methods'),(11,'3D/4D Modelling Systems','3D/4D Modelling'),(12,'Revolutionary Architecture and Generative Form','Revolutionary Arch.'),(13,'Human-Computer Interaction','HCI'),(14,'Information Visualization','Information Visual.'),(15,'Mass Customisation','Mass Customisation'),(16,'Simulation and Virtual Prototyping','Simul.& Virt. Protyp'),(17,'Virtual Environment and Knowledge Management','Virtual Environment'),(18,'Virtual Architecture','Virtual Architecture'),(19,'Virtual Reality','Virtual Reality'),(20,'Future Virtual Design and Construction','Virt. Des. and Const'),(21,'Web-Based Design and Networking','Web-Based Des.&Netw.');


