The paper tends to focus more on describing the approach textually which is dangerous in such type of studies. Although the 3D forms generated as an output of the ‘KISS Modeling’ approach are interesting, as a reader I was unable to understand the underlying method of this approach. This is due to the following reasons:
- I totally disagree that a ‘Keep it Simple, Stupid’ is a rule used for scientific research or even appropriate language! I also could not figure out what is the simplicity in keeping it stupid!!!
- Section (4) reviewing literature can tremendously be reduced to quarter its amount and in fact the author can focus more on the actual method in form-finding that directly relates to the study. This will give the author some extra space in this section to ad illustrations to describe the concepts in simple way.
- What does KISS stands for?
- Figure 1 is not clear at all. T either needs to be explained very well in the text or be detailed further with assisting figures.
- Sections (5.2.1) and (5.3) are not clear because they need to be supported with lots of figures. After all, this type of paper is describing practical development instead of theories. 
- In section (5.3): How come the ‘Delete’ button is a powerful function! The ‘Delete’ button is just a ‘Delete’ button.
- Section (6) is not clear. When it was mentioned Figures 1,2, and 3 I could not find them next to the text.
- It is very important to elaborate on Figure 2. Does each group of images show a transformation of an original object through stages? How? What kind of transformations (e.g. skew, twist, rotate, offset, etc.) applied on the input shape that result to the final mass?

Please explain your ideas simply. In fact the paper will improve more if more visual illustrations are provided.
